Case Report
A male of 72 years old was brought to Goyal hospital and endoscopic center, Kota on 14th may 2015 with complaint of pain in left upper abdomen with nausea, vomiting. Jaundice was present. On Ultrasonography he was diagnosed to have Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithasis. Liver, gall bladder and CBD duct were present on left side of the body. All the other abdominal viscera like caecum, appendix, ascending colon, duodenum, and pancreas were also on left side of body, while the spleen, splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon were on right side. So the case of situs inversus totalis was diagnosed which was confirmed with MRCP, echocardiography and CT scan.
ERCP was planned to remove the CBD stones. For this procedure the setup has to change because it is designed for normal anatomy of body. All the instruments and other supporting machines was adjusted for this patient. Usually the left lateral position is given to patient but here procedure was done in right lateral position, endoscopic surgeon also stood on right side and c-arm on left side. CBD duct cannulation attempted. Pancreatic duct cannulated and stenting, precut splitting and CBD duct cannulation done. CBD dilated upto 10mm with 10mm canula and cannulated. Stone removed with balloon sweeping. Plastic stent number 7 Fr deployed and kept in situ.
Post-operative was uneventful
Discussion
75 year old male patient having pain in left hypochondrium and signs of biliary obstruction which was confirmed with sonography, MRCP and Echography
According to past researchers, situs anomalies exhibit a wide spectrum of disorders in which many of the organs fail to develop in proper symmetry and these are accompanied with malrotation of the intestines.1
In 1949 Blegen10 reported diagnostic error in 45% of all patients with situs inversus and where incorrect incision in 31% patient was given for operation for gall stones. Vehemeyer first identified situs inversus in 1967 with x-rays4,10 Currently this type of error is minimized because of noninvasive imaging method to arrive at correct preoperative diagnosis as in this case.
Twenty per cent of the cases may be associated with bronchiecstasis and chronic sinusitis due to primary ciliary dyskinesia and this is termed as Kartegenar syndrome.4 No proper history of any respiratory disease was obtained in the present case.
Nawaz et al reported two extremely rare cases in which the situs inversus abdominus was associated with congenital partial duodenal obstruction secondary to a duodenal diaphragm with a central aperture in one case, whereas the other child had completed duodenal atresia as well as Fallot’s tetralogy.11
The malposition of the heart in situs inversus can be explained with reference to its development. There are two rotational movements which are involved during the development of the heart. In first phase of embryonic development, 180° rotation occurs around a transverse body axis, which brings the heart-anlage to the future thoracic region.5 Second phase rotation occurs around the sagittal and longitudinal axis and finally heart is properly positioned in the mediastinum.5 The exact cause of situs inversus is not known. It has been suggested that the rotations of the cardiac tube brings about all the other changes that follow. However the fundamental underlying mechanism is still not known. Any mechanical disturbance which occurs in any of the two rotational movements may give rise to abnormal positioning of the heart or dextrocardia.1,5 The present case can be explained embryo logically. The transposition of the abdominal viscera in the present case may be related to malrotation of the gastrointestinal system during the embryonic development. Interestingly, some researchers defined a gut rotation determining factor which is usually located in the left side of the body5). It has been thought that the disturbance of this gut rotation determining factor during ontogenesis may be solely responsible for situs inversus.5 An earlier study described the positive role of homeobox gene Pitx 2 in the looping mechanism of the heart and the gut.12
It may be possible, perhaps, to determine the genetic basis for the concerned genes associated with the rotation in any case of situs inversus. Cockayne (1938)13 first proposed an autosomal recessive gene which involved in complete transposition of the viscera14 However, Campbell in 1963 highlighted that there was insufficient evidence to support such a conclusion.15
Anatomic anomaly of the patient makes ERCP and operation more challenging and demanding technical skill. Endoscopic procedures such as sphintertomy, stent placement, and stone extraction are more difficult than in normal patient. Crucial factor for ERCP in situs inverses patient is to put the patient in different position during procedure.
The instrumentation, side view endoscope is built for right side position of liver with papilla on medial side of duodenum.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction are standard procedures for the removal of bile duct stones. Therapeutic ERCP for bile duct st ones has a success rate of 96-100%.16
SIT increases the technical difficulties and the possibilities of complications of therapeutic interventions. Pathak et al8 reported a case of ERCP performed in SIT. Keeping the patient in the prone position and the endoscopist at the left side, but that procedure was done with rotation of the instrument. In this case, we succeeded to pass the stomach and to reach the duodenum with 180 degrees turn and complete the sphinterotomy and stone extraction.
Conclusion
In the present case, situs inversus totalis was explained embryologically. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction are standard procedure for the removal of bile duct stones. The instrument for the side view endoscope is built for the right position of the liver with the papilla at the medial side of the duodenum. While this report shows that an experienced endoscopic surgeon can achieve the same results in the conventional way as it is possible when anatomical changes occur as in this case.
Article DOI
