Get Permission Rizvi and Sawant: Morphometric assessment of sternal foramina and sternal variations


Introduction

The sternum, also known as the breastbone, is indeed a crucial component of the thoracic cage. It is divided into three parts: the manubrium (prosternum), the body of the sternum (mesosternum), and the xiphoid process (metasternum). Manubrium (Prosternum) is the superior part of the sternum. It is identified by the suprasternal notch in the midline and the clavicular notches laterally. The manubrium articulates laterally with the sternal end of the clavicle, forming the sternoclavicular joint. Additionally, it articulates with the first and second costal cartilages, forming the first and second chondrosternal joints, respectively.1 Body of the Sternum (Mesosternum) is curved anteriorly and concave posteriorly. It articulates superiorly with the manubrium forming the manubriosternal joint and inferiorly with the xiphoid process forming the xiphisternal joint. Laterally, it features articulations for the third to sixth costal cartilages.2 Xiphoid Process or Metasternum is the most inferior and shortest part of the sternum. It exhibits considerable variation in shape and size among individuals. It articulates laterally with the inferior portion of the seventh costal cartilage. These articulations and divisions of the sternum play important roles in providing structural support to the thoracic cage and facilitating movements of the ribcage during breathing and other activities.3

The sternum develops from the fusion of two cartilaginous sternal plates during fetal development. Initially, two bars of cartilage merge towards each other in eighth week of gestation to form the manubrium and the body of the sternum. The body of the sternum originates from four mesenchymal bars known as sternal bars. Chondrification of these bars occurs from cranial to caudal, forming sternebrae. Ossification typically begins around the tenth week of gestation. The sternum is ossified from six ossification centers: one for the manubrium, four for the body of the sternum, and one for the xiphoid process. The ossification centers for the upper part develop earlier and progress downwards over time. The timing of appearance of ossification centers follows a specific pattern, with the ossification centers for the manubrium and the initial pieces of the body of the sternum appearing first.4 Incomplete fusion of the sternebrae or failure of fusion can lead to the development of a sternal foramen. This foramen, which can vary in size and shape, is typically located between the third and fourth sternebrae. The occurrence of a sternal foramen is attributed to irregular union, variations in the number and position of ossification centers, and the level of completeness in fusion. The clinical significance of a sternal foramen lies in the potential risks associated with medical procedures such as acupuncture or sternal puncture for bone marrow biopsy. Failure to recognize the presence of a sternal foramen can lead to serious complications, including damage to the pericardium and heart, highlighting the importance of thorough anatomical knowledge and careful clinical practice.5

Aim of the Study

  1. To study the presence or absence of sternal foramen,

  2. To study the site, size, shape and number of sternal foramina

  3. To study the shape of the sternal bone

  4. To underscore the possible clinical implications for patients with sternal foramina, outline essential guidelines for safely conducting sternal procedures in the presence of this anomaly and to prevent misinterpretations in radiological and pathological assessments.

Materials and Methods

100 dried human adult sterna were studied in the Department of Anatomy of K. J. Somaiya Medical College, Sion, Mumbai. They were grossly examined for the different shapes, presence and absence of sternal foramen, the location of the foramen and variations in the shape of the sternum. The size of the sternal foramen was measured with the help of digital vernier callipers. Photographic were taken for documentation.

Results

In this study, 20 sterna showed the presence of sternal foramen. Single sternal foramen in the body of the sternum was noted in 14 bones, 2 bones showed the presence of a translucent gap instead of a complete foramen, in 4 bones a foramen was observed in the xiphoid process of which 3 foramina were complete and one was incomplete.

The shape of the sternum was observed as normal flat shape in 42 sterna, longitudinal in 36 and oval in 22 specimens. The shape of the manubrium also showed variations, Triangular shape was seen in 20 specimens, quadrangular manubrium was observed in 65 and trapezoid shape in 15 specimens.

A number of variations were observed in the Xiphoid process, bifid Xiphoid was most prevalent seen in 33 specimens, other shapes observed were triple Xiphoid in 1 specimen, hook like in 2 specimens, reverse S shaped in 1 specimen, elongated in 3 specimens, curved ventrally in 1 specimen and curved dorsally in 1 specimen.

Table 1

No. of specimens showing presence of sternal foramen

Sternal Foramen

No. of specimens %

Location of Foramen

3rd costal notch

4th costal notch

5th costal notch

6th costal notch

7th costal notch

Presence of SF in body of sternum

14

5

4

2

1

2

Translucent gap in body of sternum

2

-

1

1

-

-

Presence of SF in Xiphoid process

4

-

-

-

-

-

Table 2

Size of sternal foramen in mm with vernier calliper

No. of foramen

3rd costal notch

4th costal notch

5th costal notch

6th costal notch

7th costal notch

Xiphoid process

1

3.65 x 7.5

6.38 x 10.4

4 x 5

4.65 x 7.35

3.28 x 10.1

5.5 x 4.5

2

4 x 10

3.2 x 7.55

3.12 x 6.5

5 x 8,5

3.8 x 7.3

3

5.35 x 7.22

4 x 5.24

-

-

-

4.2 x 3.5

4

4 x 10.55

5.5 x 4.5

-

-

-

Incomplete

5

5..81 x 1.67

-

-

-

-

Translucent gap

-

11.72 x 8

5.3 x 3.92

-

-

-

Figure 1

Specimens showing presence of sternal foramen; A): Photographic presentationof normal sternum; B): Photographic presentation of sternal foramen at seventh costal notch level; C): Photographic presentation of sternal foramen at sixth costal notch level; D): Photographic presentation of sternal foramen at fifth costal notch level; E): Photographic presentation of sternal foramen at forth costal notch level; F): Photographic presentation of sternal foramen at third costal notch level; G): Photographic presentation of translucent sternal foramen; H): Photographic presentation of translucent sternal foramen

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/23cca5ed-7d8b-4309-9b5a-96c66cec875a/image/998c5c3c-e330-42c7-b925-90d1f40d5f6d-uimage.png

Table 3

No. of specimens showing variations in shape of manubrium and sternum

Shape of manubrium

Shape of sternum

Triangular

Quadrangular

Trapezoid

Normal Flat

Longitudinal

Oval

20

65

15

42

36

22

Table 4

No. of specimens showing variations in Xiphoid process

Normal

Bifid

Triple

Hook like

Reverse S shaped

Elongated

Ventral deviation

Dorsal Deviation

58

33

1

2

1

3

1

1

Figure 2

Showing variations in the shape of sternum, manubrium and xiphoid process; A): Photographic presentation of quadrangular shape of manubrium; B): Photographic presentation of Triangular shape manubrium; C): Photographic presentation of trapezoid shape manubrium; D): Photographic presentation of flat shape of stemum; E): Photographic presentation of longitudinal shape of sternum; F): Photographic presentation of oval shape of sternum; G): Photographic presentation of bifid xiphoid process; H): Photographic presentation of bifid xiphoid process- Separate stems

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/23cca5ed-7d8b-4309-9b5a-96c66cec875a/image/31f0542a-be44-4812-aa21-e3ee95271668-uimage.png

Figure 3

Showing variations in the xiphoid process; A): Photographic presentation of triple xiphoid prosess; B): Photographic presentation of elongated xiphoid process; C): Photographic presentation of ventral deviation of xiphoid process; D): Photographic presentation of dorsal deviation of xiphoid process; E): Photographic presentation of hook like xiphoid process; F): Photographic presentation of reverse shape xiphoid process; G): Photographic presentation of incomplete xiphoid foramina; H): Photographic presentation of complete xiphoid foramina

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/23cca5ed-7d8b-4309-9b5a-96c66cec875a/image/3b2cdf7a-3afa-4fda-9bf6-31252dd98011-uimage.png

Discussion

The sternum originates from the transformation of bilateral sternal plates during embryonic development. Fusion of these plates with the ribs commences approximately during the 10th week of fetal life. Following this, the process of sternal bone formation takes place through endochondral ossification, which is governed by specific ossification centers situated in both the manubrium (one center) and the mesosternum (three centers). Ossification progresses along distinct segments within the mesosternum, termed as sternebrae. Morphological changes in size and structure occur in the sternum until around the age of 30, with segmental fusion potentially continuing until about the 25th year of life. In cases where fusion is hindered, it can lead to the manifestation of a cleft sternum or sternal foramen. Sternal foramina denote particular structural anomalies within the sternum.6 Defects in the partial fusion of cartilage bars can result in the formation of openings within the sternum. These sternal foramina may emerge in the manubrium, body, or xiphoid process. Their presence signifies an impaired fusion of ossified segments, which can manifest in any anatomical region of the sternum.7 Various studies in the literature have reported a prevalence of sternal foramina ranging from 6% to 20%. In a study conducted by Paraskevas et al.,8 the incidence was found to be 18.3%, which closely aligns with our own findings. Interestingly, Paraskevas et al. observed one specimen with multiple xiphoid foramina, a feature not encountered in our study. Other investigations, such as those by Gkantsinikoudis et al.9 (14.2% in males, 6.6% in females), Kirum et al.10 (12.9%), Busaid et al. 11 (13.8%), Arumugam12 (14%), and Babinski et al.13 (16.6%), reported incidences ranging between 12% to 16%. However, Cooper PD et al.14 reported a notably lower incidence of sternal foramina at 6.7%, along with the observation of a manubrial foramen in one specimen. Arumugam, in a study of 80 dry sterna, noted a foramen in 2% of the manubria, a relatively rare occurrence. In contrast, our study did not observe any foramina in the manubrium. Similarly, other authors like Kumarasamy et al.,15 Kumar et al.,16 and Tandon et al.17 noted sternal foramina in only one specimen each in their respective studies. Furthermore, a multidetector CT study by Duraikannu et al.18 depicted well-corticated, round to oval-shaped defects in the midline of the sternal body, with an average diameter of 6 mm, with the largest foramen measuring 11 mm. They also identified a specimen with multiple foramina in the body and xiphoid, and another specimen in which the foramen was not completely formed or was translucent, a phenomenon they termed as a 'Pseudoforamen', similar to observations made in our study. In our current investigation, the sternal foramina exhibited oval or round shapes, consistent with previous studies mentioned earlier. The average vertical and transverse diameters of the sternal foramina reported in the literature ranged from 3.4mm to 6.7mm. However, in our study, we found that the mean vertical diameter was 4.4 mm and the mean transverse diameter was 6.9mm. Interestingly, the maximum vertical diameter observed in the translucent gap was 11.72mm, surpassing measurements from other studies. In a cadaveric examination conducted by Selthofer et al.,19 the standard shape of the sternal body was described as longitudinal or oval. More recently, in a study by Bayarogullari et al.20 assessing the postnatal development of the sternum using MDCT, the flat type was the most commonly observed. In our investigation, we found that the flat type was present in 42% of the specimens examined.

Table 5

Incidence of sternal foramina in the literature

Study

No. of specimens

Percentage of sternal foramen observed

Mean diameter of SF (Vertical Transverse)

Cooper PD et al (1988)

2016 Radiographs

6.7

Busaid et al (2012)

80

13.8

Babinski et al (2012)

180

16.6

5.5 – 4.5

Paraskevas et al (2015)

60

18.3

4.4 -3.4

Gkantsinikoudis et al (2017)

35 (20 males and 15 females)

14.2 in male, 6.6 female

5.1- 4.8

Kirum et al (2017)

85

12.9

Arumugam et al (2018)

80

14

Present study (2024)

1002

20

4.4 – 6.9

Clinical Significance

Individuals with a sternal foramen typically do not exhibit symptoms, and the presence of the defect is often discovered incidentally through radiological imaging or during midline sternotomy procedures. Despite appearing minor, a sternal foramen holds significant clinical implications that are frequently overlooked by clinicians, acupuncturists, radiologists, and pathologists. The clinical significance of this defect becomes evident during procedures in the region, such as bone marrow biopsy or acupuncture, where the sternum's proximity to mediastinal structures exposes the lungs, heart, and major blood vessels to potential harm. Complications stemming from sternal puncture have been documented in medical literature, including inadvertent puncture of retrosternal organs like the heart and lungs, which can lead to conditions such as tamponade or pneumothorax. Instances of fatal cardiac tamponade following sternal puncture in the lower part of the sternum associated with a congenital sternal foramen have been reported.21 On oblique radiographs, sternal foramina may be detectable, although the superimposition of mediastinal structures can partially obscure the anomaly. Helical or Multislice CT imaging provides the clearest visualization of bone structures without superimposition and is the preferred imaging modality for confirming the diagnosis of sternal foramina. However, in cross-sectional imaging of the sternum, sternal foramina can be mistakenly interpreted as osteolytic lesions.22 Other variations of the sternum include a double-ended xiphoid process and a single xiphoid foramen. A cleft sternum, resulting from the incomplete midline fusion of the sternum, exposes the heart and major blood vessels and is often associated with craniofacial haemangioma and omphalocele. Sternal foramina may also be linked with accessory fissures in the left lung. Performing blinded sternal interventions in patients with a sternal foramen can lead to fatal injuries in the pericardium, right ventricle of the heart, or aorta. In lean individuals, the distance between the skin and the pericardium is typically only about 10-20 mm. Among reported injuries resulting from a lack of awareness of sternal foramina, 14 cases involved cardiac tamponade, eight of which were fatal.23 Therefore, it is essential to review previous CT scans or conduct pre-procedural ultrasound scans to exclude the presence of a sternal foramen before undertaking such interventions. It is imperative to exercise caution when inserting a needle, particularly if it seems to be penetrating deeper than the level of the adjacent sternal surface, which may indicate the presence of a sternal foramen (SF). Needles should be directed towards the upper part of the sternal body to avoid the 'danger zone' located between the fourth and sixth costochondral junctions. Additionally, conducting a sternal biopsy under CT guidance enhances safety.24 Furthermore, awareness of this anomaly holds significance in forensic medicine. The presence of sternal holes can potentially be misinterpreted as penetrating traumatic injuries or instances of bullet penetration, or they may be mistaken for acquired lesions such as fractures or lytic lesions.25 Therefore, understanding the existence of sternal foramina is crucial for accurate forensic evaluation.

Conclusion

Awareness of this variation is crucial for radiologists, clinicians, and forensic experts alike. Before conducting intrinsic procedures such as bone marrow biopsy or acupuncture, it's essential to consider the presence of potential sternal foramen for serious complications like cardiac tamponade and pneumothorax following sternal puncture. Therefore, it is advisable to obtain radiographs to rule out sternum variations before proceeding with such procedures. This precaution can help mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes associated with sternal puncture in individuals with S.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

CS Sinnatamby Last anatomy regional and applied12th EdElsevierUSA2011

2 

GM Graeber M Nazim The anatomy of the ribs and the sternum and their relationship to chest wall structure and functionThorac Surg Clin200717447389

3 

YZ Xie BJ Wang JS Yun GH Chung ZB Ma XJ Li Morphology of the human xiphoid process: dissection and radiography of cadavers and MDCT of patientsSurg Radiol Anat201436320917

4 

S Standring The Anatomical Basis of Clinical PracticeGray’s Anatomy40thChurchill Livingstone ElsevierLondon2008

5 

WJ Larsen Human embryology2nd ednChurchill LivingstoneNew York1997778

6 

MK Moore JH Stewart WF Mccormick Anomalies of the human chest plate area: Radiographic findings in a large autopsy populationAm J Forensic Med Pathol19889434854

7 

GT Ashley The relationship between the pattern of ossification and the definitive shape of the mesosternum in manJ Anat195690187105

8 

G Paraskevas M Tzika N Anastasopoulos P Kitsoulis G Sofidis K Natsis Sternal foramina: incidence in Greek population, anatomy and clinical considerationsSurg Radiol Anat201537784551

9 

N Gkantsinikoudis C Chaniotakis G Gkasdaris N Georgiou S Kapetanakis Morphological approach of the sterna foramen an Anatomic study and short review of the literatureFolia Morphol (Warsz)201676348490

10 

GG Kirum IG Munabi J Kukiriza G Tumusiime M Kange C Ibingira Anatomical variations of the sternal angle and anomalies of adult human sterna from the Galloway osteological collection at Makerere University Anatomy DepartmentFolia Morphol (Warsz)201776468994

11 

H El-Busaid W Kaisha J Hassanali S Hassan J Ogeng'o P Mandela Sternal foramina and variant xiphoid morphology in a Kenyan populationFolia Morphol (Warsz)20117111922

12 

K Arumugam GA Hemalatha Morphometric study of sternal foramen in adult human dry sternumInt J Anat Var20181141114

13 

MA Babinski FA Rafael AD Steil CF Rodrigueset EA Sgrottal High prevalence of sternal foramen: Quantitative, anatomical analysis and its clinical implication in acupuncture practiceInt J Morphol201230310429

14 

PD Cooper JH Stewart WF Mccormick Development and morphology of the sternal foramenAm J Forensic Med Pathol1988943427

15 

SA Kumarasamy R Agrawal A large sternal foramenInt J Anat Var201141956

16 

J Kumar S K Dhattaswall V Pal The sternal foramen: The possible forensic misinterpretation of an anatomic abnormalityJ Ind Acad Foren Med20151373156

17 

A Tandon RD Garo Sternal foramen case reportMed J Dr. DY Patil Univ201691278

18 

C Duraikannu OV Noronha P Sundarrajan MDCT evaluation of sternal variations: Pictorial essayIndian J Radiol Imaging201626218594

19 

R Selthofer V Nikolić T Mrcela Morphometric analysis of the sternumColl Antropol2006301437

20 

H Bayarogullari E Yengil R Davran E Ağlagül S Karazincir A Balcı Evaluation of the postnatal development of the sternum and sternal variations using multidetector CTDiagn Interv Radiol2014201829

21 

TB Halvorsen SS Anda AB Naess Fatal cardiac tamponade after acupuncture through congenital sternal foramenLancet199534589581175

22 

E Yekeler M Tunaci A Tunaci M Dursun G Acunas Frequency of sternal variations and anomalies evaluated by MDCTAJR Am J Roentgenol2006186495660

23 

J Skandalakis Skandalakis Surgical Anatomy: The Embryologic And Anatomic Basis Of Modern SurgeryJaypeeIndia2004

24 

C Uzun ED Atman E Ustuner SA Mirjalili D Oztuna TS Esmer Surface anatomy and anatomical planes in the adult turkish populationClin Anat201629218390

25 

J Gossner Relationship of sternal foramina to vital structures of the chest: a computed tomographic studyAnat Res Int2013201378019310.1155/2013/780193



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 05-04-2024

Accepted : 28-04-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2024.008


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 585

PDF Downloaded: 246