Get Permission Akshaya S and KR Dakshayani: Morphometric analysis of infraorbital foramen in human dry skull of south Indian population and its clinical implications


Introduction

Infraorbital foramen is located in the maxilla of the skull bone. The skull is the most complex bony structure in the body. It consists of cranium, facial skeleton, mandible. The vicero cranium (facial skeleton) hangs down from the front of neurocranium (calvaria and basi cranium) and houses the organ of sight, smell, taste as well as openings to the respiratory and digestive systems via nose and mouth respectively. The Upper part of the face is occupied by the orbit and the bridge of the nose. Each orbital opening is roughly quadrangular in shape. The, upper, supraorbital margin is formed entirely by the frontal bone.

Infraorbital margin is formed by zygomatic bone laterally and maxilla medially. Infraorbital margins are sharp and palpable. The anterior nasal aperture is pyriform in shape, wider below than the above. The upper boundary of aperture is formed by nasal bone while the remainder is formed by maxillae. The anterior nasal spine marks the upper limit of the inter maxillary suture at the lower margin of anterior nasal aperture and is palpable in the nasal septum.

The infraorbital foramen transmits the infra orbital vessels and nerve, and lies about 1cm below the middle of the infraorbital margin in maxillary bone. It commonly aligns with a vertical axis passing through maxillary tooth 5 and sits an average of 2.5 cm from the midline face with difference noted between genders and side. The infra orbital nerve, the continuation of maxillary division of trigeminal nerve is a sensory nerve. It supplies skin of the lower eye lid, skin of the side of nose, movable part of nasal septum, skin of anterior part of cheek and upper lip. The branches of the infraorbital nerve joined from the branches of the facial nerve to form the infraorbital plexus. The infraorbital nerve is commonly implicated in trigeminal neuralgia and amenable to cryotherapy when medical therapy fails.1

IOF is an important anatomical landmark in anaesthetic and surgical interventions of the maxillary region. Infraorbital nerve block is commonly used in regional anaesthesia for the midface and paranasal surgeries. The infraorbital nerve is the nerve of choice for regional nerve block when performing surgeries in the, buccal and nasal and orbital areas. The infraorbital nerve block is performed by reaching the nerve through an intra oral or an extraoral route.2 When the site of infraorbital foramen is found, the needle can be advanced either through the skin directly toward the infraorbital foramen or through the mouth at the level of incisor at alveolar buccal margin in the subsulcal plane. This implies the clinical importance of surgical location and anatomical variations of this region. The surgeries performed around infraorbital foramen that is orbital floor and midface surgeries, involves like orthognathic surgeries for correction of maxillary arch discrepancies and management of Le fort-II fractures and cald well -luc operation done for begin diseases that affects maxillary sinus such as chronic sinusitis, fugal sinusitis, polyposis, biopsy, internal maxillary artery ligation for epistaxis, oroantral fistulas and dental procedures.3 Hence, the detailed knowledge of the anatomical location and variations of Infra orbital foramen are necessary for the successful regional anaesthesia and for the conventional and endoscopic surgeries of the maxillary region.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted on 50 Human skull bones of unknown gender from the Department of Anatomy Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore. Human adult skull bones without any deformity were included in the study. The study was approved by institutional ethics committee, Mysore Medical college and research institute, Mysore(number EC REG:ECR/134/Inst/KA/2013/RR-19). Foetal skulls and skulls with facial fractures were excluded from the study. Both side of skulls were visually observed for shape, direction of the infraorbital foramen and presence of accessory infraorbital foramina.4 The study was conducted in the months of August, September, October, November(4 months), year 2021.

  1. Sagittal Distance between the infraorbital margin to upper margin of infraorbital foramen were measured.

  2. Transverse diameter from lateral margin of pyriform aperture to medial margin of IOF were measured. {Fig no 4}

  3. Oblique distance from anterior nasal spine to inferior margin of IOF, were measured.(Figure 3)

  4. Vertical and transverse diameter of the IOF were measured.5

All the measurements were done on both side of the skull by using sliding vernier calliper{lab world} with the accuracy of 0.1 mm. Software used is SPSS (Trial Version)-23.

Results

50 skulls (100 sides – both right and left were studied.

Most commonly observed shape of IOF is semilunar 36% on right side, 40% on left side, transversely oval 20% on right side, 28% on left side, vertically oval 18% on right side, 12% on left side, circular 18 on right side, 8% on left side, triangular 8% on right side 12% on left side.(Figure 2, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 8) Direction of IOF is 88% medially downwards, 12% downwards.(Figure 1, Figure 8)

Figure 1

Direction of infraorbital foramen

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/44584619-ca3c-448a-b0c2-b0474006f3e7-uimage.png

Figure 2

Shape of infraorbital foramen

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/a1dd2908-2e45-459f-928c-ce07d7b8e235-uimage.png

Figure 3

Measurement of distance from anterior nasal spine to infraorbital foramen using vernier caliper

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/94e117ef-8a31-4b7d-9e69-670fb8057db8-uimage.png

Figure 4

Measurement of distance from Pyriform aperture (PA) and infraorbital margin to infraorbital foramen

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/2aadac6e-e6f6-4bc4-b098-31813adfb172-uimage.png

Figure 5

Shape of IOF : Right – Triangular, Left - Semilunar

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/aa6b96d7-7f00-47da-9c0f-99fb09a66f1f-uimage.png

Figure 6

Right side – Vertically oval, Left side – Transversely oval

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/29b25875-d566-4df4-b450-101d28679e4f-uimage.png

Figure 7

Bilateral accessory foramen

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/3fe7b65f-c318-43f1-a6b1-0f27035b195b-uimage.png

Figure 8

Right side IOF direction – Medially downwards, Left side IOF shape - Triangular

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/99bc235d-f1fd-427a-91d7-bc3d6e8cc648/image/2ddeb3a2-e9de-4d43-a197-e1b8804434fa-uimage.png

The mean distance between superior margin of IOM and IOF is6.58±0.28 mm on the right side & 6.78+0.233 mm on the left side. Maximum distance between superior margin of IOM to IOF 1.8 mm on the right side 1.8 mm on the left side (both on same skull). Minimum distance between IOM TO IOF 3 mm on the right side & 3 mm on the left side (on different skull).

The mean distance between pyriform aperture to medial margin of IOF 16.88+3.7mm on the right side & 16.46 +2.7mm on the left side. The maximum distance between pyriform aperture to medial margin of IOF 27 mm on the right side & 23mm on the left side. The minimum distance between pyriform aperture to medial margin of IOF 13 mm on the right side &12 mm on the left side.

The mean distance between ANS to inferior margin of IOF 34.22+0.55 mm on right side & 34.77+0.3 mm on left side.

Mean vertical diameter of IOF 3.76 mm on right side & 3.94 mm on left side. Minimum vertical diameter of IOF is 2mm on both sides. Maximum vertical diameter of IOF is 7mm on both sides.

Mean transverse diameter of IOF 4.18 mm onright side & 4.32+15 mm on the left side. Minimum transverse diameter on right side is 3mm& 2mm on left side. Maximum transverse diameter 5mm on right side & 7mm on left side.

Accessory IOF were present in 6% of skulls bilaterally. They lie medial to the IOF with mean distance between them as 5 mm on right side & 3 mm on left side. (Figure 7), (Table 1, Table 2)

Table 1

Number of accessory infraorbital foramen

Right

Left

Single Infraorbital Foramen

50

50

Accessory Infraorbital Foramen

3

3

50

50

Table 2

Mean distance between accessory infraorbital foramen and nearby anatomical landmarks

Infra orbital foramen- accessory infraorbital foramen Mean

Infraorbital margin – Accessory infraorbital foramen Mean

Pyriform aperture – Accessory infraorbital foramen Mean

Anterior nasal spine – Accessory infraorbital foramen Mean

Right side

Left side

Right side

Left side

Right side

Left side

Right side

Left side

5 mm

3 mm

3 mm

3mm

18 mm

19 mm

35mm

34 mm

Table 3

Distance between infraorbital margin to infraorbital foramen

Infraorbital Margin – Infraorbital Foramen

Study

Right side

Left side

Author, Place and year of the study

No of specimen (bones) studied

Minimum

Maximum

Mean standard deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Mean standard deviation

Nayanakara et al,6 Sri lanka , 2016

50

3.28 mm

15.47 mm

6.52 ± 2.03 mm

3.mm

11.53mm

7.30 ± 1.57mm

Zuberi et al5,

Maharashtra, 2016

43

-

-

6.75+1.76mm

-

-

6.95*+1.68mm

Rajeshwari et al,7 Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 2016.

52

2.5mm

6mm

3.62mm

3.8 mm

Veeramurthu et al8, Tamil nadu 2016

105

5mm

13mm

7.22+1.64mm

4mm

11mm

6.78+1.64mm

Masooma Begam Shiny Vinila9 Telungana 2019

52

-

-

7.31+1.54 mm

-

-

7.27+1.43mm

Bahath10,

Mysore, Karnataka 2019

14

3.29mm

7.59mm

5.49+1.1mm

4.51mm

8.56mm

5.85+1.06mm

Ananya et al,11

Chennai, Tamil nadu 2019

50

-

-

9.704 mm

-

-

1.0004 mm

Present Study, Myore, Karnataka 2021

50

3mm

1.8mm

6.58+ 2.8mm

4mm

1.8mm

6.78 +2.33mm

Table 4

Distance between pyriform aperture to infraorbital foramen

    Anterior Nasal Spine To Infraorbital Foramen

Right side

Left side

Author, Place, Year of the study

No of specimen studied

Minimum

Maximim

Mean standard deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Mean standard deviation

Nayanakara et al, Sri lanka, 2016

50

25.35mm

40.47 mm

33.81 ± 2.68 Mm

23.99mm

39.75mm

34.23 ± 2.56mm

Zuberi et al,4 Maharashtra, 2016

43

-

-

33.35+3.25 Mm

-

-

33.23+3.75mm

Veeramurthu et al,8 Tamil nadu 2016

105

26mm

40mm

32.62+3.4mm

27mm

38mm

33.52+3.37mm

Bagath et al, 10 Mysore, 2019

14

28.47mm

37.99 mm

33.62+2.22 Mm

29.18 Mm

35.92 Mm

33.13+2.30mm

Masooma Shiny vinila et al,9 Mysore, 2019

52

-

-

32.46+2.55

-

-

31.70+2.36mm

Present Study , Mysore 2021

50

30mm

40mm

30.422+5.5mm

20.7 mm

40mm

30.47 +3 mm

Table 5

Distance between pyriform aperture to infraorbital foramen

Pyriform aperture to infraorbital foramen

Author, place. Year of the study

No of specimen (bones)studied

Right Side

Left side

Minimum

Maximum

Mean with Standard Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

MEAN with Standard deviation

Zubeir et al, 4 Maharashtra, 2016

43

-

-

18.50+2.52mm

-

-

18.30+2.35mm

Rajeshwari et al,7 Tamil nadu,2016

52

11mm

16mm

7. 451 mm

-

-

7.865 mm

Veeramurhu et al,8 Tamil nadu 2016

105

13mm

23mm

17.8+2.94mm

11mm

23mm

17.2+2.75mm

Masooma et al,9 Mysore, 2019

52

-

-

16.57 +1.90mm

-

-

16.13 mm

Present Study, Mysore 2021

50

1.3mm

2.7mm

1.688+0.37mm

1.2mm

2.3mm

1.646+0.27

Table 6

Vertical diameter of infraorbital foramen

Vertical diameter

Study

Right

Left

MIN

MAX

MEAN SD

MIN

MAX

MEAN SD

Nayanakara et al, Sri lanka, 2016

50

1.46 mm

3.78mm

3.11±0.61mm

2.42mm

4.16mm

3.31±0.55mm

Masooma, Vinila et al,9 Mysore, 2019

52

NA

NA

3.57+0.85mm

NA

NA

3.18+0.83mm

Veeramurthu et al,8 Tamil nadu 2016

105

2mm

8mm

3.88+1.17mm

2mm

6mm

3.68+0.89mm

Bagath et Al,10 Mysore, 2019

14

2.23mm

5.02mm

3.95+0.86mm

2.08mm

5.39mm

3.82+0.83mm

Ananya et al11 Chennai, 2019

50

NA

NA

4.1 +0.52mm

NA

NA

NA

Present Study, Mysore, Karnataka, 2021

50

2mm

7mm

3.76,+0.13

2mm

7mm

3.94 +0.13

Table 7

Transverse diameter of infraorbital foramen

Transverse Diameter

Right side

Left side

Author, place and year of the study

Number of specimen studied

MIN

MAX

MEAN SD

MIN

MAX

MEAN SD

Nayanakara et al, Sri lanka, 2016

50

2.10mm

4.17mm

3.27 ± 0.58mm

2.55mm

4.47mm

3.33±0.59mm

Masooma et al, Mysore, 2019

52

NA

NA

2.88+0.62mm

NA

NA

2.98+0.59mm

Veeramuthu et al,8 Tamil nadu 2016

105

2mm

10mm

3.82+1.58mm

2mm

10mm

3.92+1.46mm

Bagath et al,10 Mysore, 2019

14

0.8mm

5.02mm

3.70mm

2.11mm

6.91mm

3.70+1.20mm

Ananya et al,11 Chennai, 2019

50

-

-

4.9+0.56

-

-

-

Present Study , Mysore, Karnataka 2021

50

3mm

5mm

4.18,+1.2

2mm

7mm

4.32 +1.5mm

Discussion

Infraorbital nerve (ION) is one of the important nerves of facial skeleton which is commonly used for local anaesthetic block during maxillofacial surgeries, dental procedures, maxillary sinus exploration and endoscopic surgeries involving zygomatic-maxillary region. Any inadvertent injury to the Infra orbital nerve will result in neurological disturbances involving lower lid, lateral side of nose, upper lip affecting the day-to-day activities of the patients. Because of its utmost importance plastic and ENT surgeons try to preserve this nerve during maxillofacial surgeries for which knowledge of the exact location of IOF with reference to the nearby anatomical landmarks is mandatory for the expert surgeons & anaesthetists.

Our study tried to explore the exact location and anatomical variations of IOF with reference to the nearby anatomical landmarks by measuring the distance between Infraorbital foramen, and Infraorbital margin, Pyriform aperture, Anterior nasal spine.

Vertical diameter and transverse diameter of IOF were also measured. Because larger or smaller dimensions may indicate the size of infraorbital nerve and vessels may need increase or decrease the dose of local anaesthetic drugs. Shape and direction of IOF were also recorded to give a clear vision to the surgeons.

Regarding the distance between the IOM & IOF mean distance of 6.58 mm on R side, 6.78 mm on left side is similar to Zuberi et al.4 Rajeshwari et al7 and Bahath et al10 found the lesser dimensions than us. Maoori9 and Veeramuthu8 found larger dimensions than us. Nayanakara et al6 found that IOF is located closer to the IOM on the right compared to the left. Furthermore, the left side IOF had larger dimensions than the right IOF. This right n left side differences are observed in our study too. A similar statistically significant difference was observed in the distance from the infraorbital foramen to infraorbital margin that infraorbital foramen is located closer to infraorbital margin in right than left side implying accurate measurements were taken in our study.(Table 3)

Regarding distance between IOF and pyriform aperture our study measurements are similar with Veeramuthu et al8 and Masoori et al.9 Rajeshwari et al found lesser values than us. (Table 5)

Distance between ANS and IOF, previous all studies showed mean distance of 33 to 34 mm on both sides, goes same measurements with our study too with mean of 34. 7mm right side, 34.2 mm left side help in exact identification of location of IOF during clinical procedures. (Table 4)

Mean Vertical diameter of IOF observed mean of 3.76 mm on right side 3.94 mm on left side, another proof of larger dimensions on left side goes similar with Zuberi et al5 and Nayanakara6 et al. (Table 6)

Transverse diameter OF IOF 4.18 mm on right side 4.320 mm on left side, indicating larger measurements on left side. (Table 7)

Accessory foramen is present in 6% of skulls. All were bilaterally present. (Table 1). Previous studies results show different percentage of presence of AIOF in various ethnic groups.

Berry and Berry12 documented 4.7% in Egyptians, 6.4% in Nigerians, 6.4% in Palestinians, 6.7% in Indians, 6% in North Americans, 13.2% in South Americans.

Accessory branch of infraorbital nerve passes via the AIOF implies exact site of AIOF to be known to take the adequate precautions prior to any surgical intervention of this region to preserve the accessory infraorbital nerve. The knowledge of anatomical location and number of accessory foramen is mandatory, to give adequate dosage anaesthetic agents to block the accessory branches of infraorbital nerve, during of midfacies, maxillary and or orbital floor surgical procedures.4

In our study AIOF is 6% close proximity with Indian values as reported by Beri and Beri. In our study AIOF is Circular in shape, lies medial to IOF, and distance between them with mean of 4mm on the right side, 3 mm on the left side in all skulls. (Table 2) Tezer et al13 observed in their study 93.3% of AIOF lies superomedial to IOF and 6.7% lies inferomedial to IOF.

Conclusion

Here we are concluding with, observations obtained by our study showing morphometry of various shape, size direction and exact location of IOF with nearby anatomical landmarks are at close proximity with the results obtained by various authors studied the infraorbital region in same and different geographical population. Minor differences in results noted were may due to ethnic and racial variations. So, the results of our study are another strong evidence of presence of anatomical variations (like accessory infraorbital foramen) in this region that will surely a great guide for general surgeons, ENT professionals, Plastic surgeons, Anaesthetists and dentists operating this region.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

BK Potu GC Srungvarapu T Pulakunta Morphometric evaluation of the infraorbital foramen in human dry skulls of south Indian populationItal J Anat Embryol2019124338291

2 

K Rajeshwari M Rohinidevi V Vimala D Megala Morphometric analysis of Infraorbital foramen in human dry skullsInt J Anat Res 20164327259

3 

M Veeramuthu R Varman Shalini Manoranjitham Morphometric analysis of infraorbital foramen and incidence of Accessory foramen and its clinical implications in dry adult human skullInt J Anat Res20164429933000

4 

M Begum BHS Vinila Morphometric Analysis of Infraorbital Foramen in the Telangana PopulationAcad Anatomica Int201952904

5 

D Nanayakkara R Peiris N Mannapperuma A Vadysinghe Morphometric Analysis of the Infraorbital Foramen: The Clinical RelevanceAnat Res Int20162016791734310.1155/2016/7917343

6 

B Ananya S Sangeetha D Premavathy Morphometric study of infraorbital foramen in local anesthesiaDrug Invention Today201912612479

7 

D Nayanakkara R Peiris M Navini A Vadysinghe Morphometric analysis of the Infraorbital foramen: The clinical relevanceAnat Res Int20162016117917343

8 

S Standring Gray S anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice41st EdElseveir Churchill Livingstone London, United Kingdom20154146

9 

A Mohammad A Fatah Computed tomographic localisation of infraorbital foramen position and correlation with age and gender of Iraq subjectsJ Baghdad Coll Dent201325Special Issue 1305

10 

B Fabiano M Maria A Jose J Roberto P Salomao F Richardo The Foramen and Infraorbital nerve related to the surgery for external access to the maxillary sinus(caldwell-luc)Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol20181233426

11 

ZH Riyaz K Moizuddin A Siddiqui Morphometric analysis of Infraorbital foramen in human skullsIndian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain201622458

12 

AC Berry RJ Berry Epigenitic variations in the human craniumJ Anat1967101Pt 236179

13 

M Tezer A Ozturk M Akgul O Gayretlio A Kale Anatomic and morphometric features of the accessory infraorbital foramenJ Morphol Sci2011282957



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 02-12-2021

Accepted : 03-02-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijcap.2022.013


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1173

PDF Downloaded: 430