Introduction
Lower extremity reconstruction following traumatic injuries has always posed a challenge to reconstructive surgeons. One of the issues faced is the possible injury to one of the two major arteries of the leg along with loss of tissue from the anterior aspect as it mostly bears the brunt of trauma. One of the most popular methods of reconstruction was the cross leg flap described by Hamilton in 1841 but with the subsequent discovery of fascicutaneous flaps by Ponten in 1981 the options for available in the lower limbs increased greatly.1, 2 Following this most of the flap research was based on elevating flaps based on single perforator vessels, which were either septocutaneous or myocutaneous.3 On examination of the factors which make for an ideal flap, there should be minimal morbidity to the patient, the flap should come from the same segment as the injured area and the anatomy of the vascular supply should be constant so that it can be harvested reliably.4, 5 With these criteria in consideration we analyzed the problem of covering long defects over tibia with tissue from posterior aspect of leg (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). We studied the perforator anatomy of the fasciocutaneous territory over the gastrocnemius muscle along with the posterior tibial and peroneal perforator system with the object of designing a combined flap that maybe harvested with the gastrocnemius perforators in order to cover long defects of tibia. This combined flap may be raised with the gastrocnemius muscle as well in order to increase the axis of rotation of the combined flap. We planned to record the number and the distance of the standard posterior tibial perforators, running between soleus and flexor digitorum longus, the medial and lateral gastrocnemius perforators and the peroneal perforators, running between soleus and flexor halluces longus, from the intercondylar line/ knee joint. This data can help determine the reliability of large flaps raised from the posterior aspect of the leg in order to cover exposed tibia in cases of open fractures.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted by dissecting twenty legs of seven males and three female cadavers.
Anthropomorphometric data of each individual was recorded and during dissection the following parameters were recorded.
Number of perforating vessels arising from the lateral and medial sural arteries travelling through the two heads of gastrocnemius muscle along with diameter of the vessels.
Number of septocutaneous perforators arising adjacent to the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle belly along with diameter of the perforators.
Distance of the perforating vessels from intercondylar line/ Knee joint.
Dissection
Dissection started by drawing a rectangle on legs posterior portion, representing the area of a fasciocutaneous flap. The proximal margin of the flap dissection was upto the intercondylar line at the knee.6 The lateral incision was given 2cm posterior to the lateral subcutaneous border of the fibula. The medial incision was given 2cm posterior to the medial subcutaneous border of the tibia. The distal incision was made around 8 cm proximal to the ankle malleolus.
The flap was harvested under loupe magnification from distal to proximal and location of the gastrocnemius perforators marked in centimeters from the intercondylar line of the knee. The number of posterior tibial septocutaneous perforators near the medial gastrocnemius perorators and the number of peroneal septocutaneous perforators adjacent to the lateral gastrocnemius perforators were also noted. This region was divided in to two combined flaps. The region of medial gsastrocnemius with the posterior tibial septocutaneous perforators was designated as the medial flap. The region overlying the lateral gastrocnemius with the peronela septocutaneous perforators was designates as the lateral flap. This division was done to study the viability of raising a combined gastrocnemius myocutaneous flap with adjacent septocutaneous perforators included as well. The diameter of the vessels was determined by calculation based upon the external circumference. The vessels were opened longitudinally and opened flatly and the length of the circumference was measured by means of a sliding caliper. Only vessels with a diameter of more than 0.2 mm were considered.
Results
Data from the cases revealed that on an average there are 2.5 perforators (range 1-4) arising from the medial head of the gastrocnemius and 1.7 perforators (range 1-3) arising from the lateral head (Figure 4). The proximal most perforator in the medial belly was 6.9 cm distal to the intercondylar line (range 4.8-8.4) and the distal most perforator 16.5cm distal to the intercondylar line (range 14.8-18.2cm) On the lateral belly the proximal most perforator was 6.7 cm distal to the intercondylar line (range 4.8-9.4cm) and the distal most perforator 15.8 cm distal to the intercondylar line (range 14.6-17.2cm). The mean diameter of the perforators arising from the medial head was 1mm (range 0.7-1.3) and those from the lateral head were 0.8mm (range 0.7-1.2mm).
The number of posterior tibial septocutaneous perforators supplying the combined medial skin flap was 1.7 (range 1-3) with an average diameter of 1.09mm (range 0.7-2mm). The average number of peroneal artery perforators supplying the combined lateral skin flap in the dissection of the skin flap was 1.5 (range 1-2) with an average diameter of 1.29mm (range 0.7mm-2.3mm).
The location of the distal most posterior tibial artery perforator from the intercondylar line was 23.3cm (range 21- 27cm) and the proximal most was 8.5cm (range 6-12cm) in the medial skin flap. The distance of the distal most peroneal artery perforator from the intercondylar line was 23.1cm (range 19 -26 cm) and the proximal most was 8.4 (range 6-11cm) in the lateral skin flap. [Figure 5] [Table 1]
Table 1
Anthropometric data and number of perforators
Discussion
There has been extensive study on the vascularity of the lower leg with respect to the presence of vascular axis. According to the angiosome concept it is possible to capture the territory of the adjacent angiosome by ligating the source vessel of the adjacent angiosome and allowing choke vessels to open up.7 In animal studies the limit of flap survival was usually up to the junction of the second and the third territory and to capture the third territory usually a delay would be required.8 This is essentially where the problem with elevating long proximally based posterior tibial or peroneal perforator flap lies, which is, that tissue beyond the second perforator is always at risk for necrosis if there has been no delay. The problem with this concept is that in a clinical situation we cannot get an estimate of the quantum of tissue that can be raised based on a single perforator irrespective of the source artery. So according to this theory we cannot explain how perforators from two different source arteries (sural and posterior tibial) could be communicating with each other.
One of the theories that does provide an insight in to this issue is the vasculosome theory which suggests the existence of vascular axes which are fed by cutaneous perforators and the directionality of these axes is dynamic and changes with sequential ligation of “feeder” vessels. Therefore if the entire axis is preserved then the entire tissue flap should survive.9 From our anatomical dissections it is clear that we can include the medial sural axis with the posterior tibial septocutaneous line and the lateral sural with the peroneal septocutaneous line. Therefore we can consider raising a flap, which includes both these axis. In the flaps raised in the anatomical dissection the distal most posterior tibial or peroneal perforator is much closer to the distal gastrocnemius cutaneous perforator than the proximal most septocutaneous perforator that is spared in flap harvest. It is likely that the distal most region of the flap will survives because of the communication between the medial sural and posterior tibial in the medial side of leg and the lateral sural and peroneal axis on the lateral side of leg. When a gastrocnemius myocutaneous flap is raised the region beyond the muscle belly is often considered to be the random portion of the isolated flap and according to convention should be raised with a length is to breadth of 1:1.10 But if a communication between the septocutaneous vascular axes and the sural vascular axes exists in this area could be included in the flap with more reliability and a large flap which could cover both proximal and middle defects of tibia could be produced. We can make this assumption because the distal most posterior tibial perforator in the flap is on an average 6.8 cm distal to the medial gastrocnemius perforator and the distal most peroneal perforator is on an average 7.3cm distal to the lateral sural perforator emerging from the lateral belly of gastrocnemius [Table 2].
The results of our anatomic study were similar to studies by Torres et al and Otani et al which place the distal most medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle perforators at 16.3 and 17.5 cm distal to the popliteal crease or the intercondylar line.11, 12 Regarding the number of perforators arising from the lateral head our results were different from the study by Otani et al which did not find any cutaneous perforator in 57% of the cases while we found at least 1 cutaneous perforator from the lateral head in 100% of the cadaveric dissections
Conclusion
On analysis of the data we found that it could be possible to raise combined flaps which include both the sural perforators emerging through the gastrocnemius muscle and the posterior tibial or the peroneal septocutaneous perforators. These combined flaps could help cover long defects of the tibia which is often exposed in the proximal and middle thirds of the leg following Gustillo 3b fractures of tibia.
Article DOI
