Get Permission Priya and Kumari: Morphometric study of abdominal aorta and its branches


Introduction

The incidence of arterial disease is in rise throughout the world due to altered dietary habits, sedentary life style, stress etc. Vascular abnormalities can result from either narrowing or obstruction of the vessel. Most of the times, an emergency surgical intervention has to be carried out to save the life of the individual.

Abdominal aorta (AA) is the major artery from which the abdominal organs receive their blood supply. Its terminal branches go on to supply the pelvis and lower limbs. It also supplies the undersurface of the diaphragm and parts of the abdominal wall. It is approximately 13cm long. It begins at T12 and ends at L4 with its bifurcation into the common iliac arteries.1 The branches of the abdominal aorta may be divided into three sets: visceral, parietal, and terminal.

Table 1
Visceral Branches Parietal Branches
Coeliac. Inferior Phrenics.
Superior Mesenteric. Lumbars.
Inferior Mesenteric. Middle Sacral.
Middle Suprarenals.
Renals. Terminal Branches
Internal Spermatics Ovarian (in female) Common Iliacs.

Of the visceral branches, the coeliac artery, the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries are unpaired, while the suprarenals, renals, internal spermatics, and ovarian are paired. Of the parietal branches the inferior phrenics and lumbars are paired; the middle sacral is unpaired. The terminal branches are paired2 (Figure 1, Figure 2).

The coeliac trunk (CT) arises from the AA immediately below the aortic hiatus at the level of T12-L1 vertebra. It is 1.5-2 cm long.

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) originates 1 cm below the CT, at the level of the L1 – L2.

The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) arises from the anterior or left anterolateral aspect of the AA at the level of L3 and 3-4 cm above aortic bifurcation (AB).

Inferior phrenic arter­ies (IPA) arise just above the CT.

The left and right middle suprarenal arteries (MSRA) arise from the lateral aspect of AA, level with the SMA.

The left and right renal arteries (RA) originate just below SMA and the right arises slightly higher than the left.

Gonadal arteries (GA) arise inferior to the RA’s

Lumbar arteries (LA) arise from the postero­lateral aspect of AA and are usually 4 pairs.

Median sacral artery (MSA) is a small branch that arises from the posterior aspect of the aorta a little above its bifurcation.3

Variations in AA and its branches are frequently ob­served and they occur due to embryological developmen­tal changes.4, 5, 6 While performing surgical and/ or radiological procedures on kidneys, the variations of Gonadal artery should be looked for carefully.4 Knowledge about morphology of AA and its branches is im­portant in regards to renal transplantation, renal trauma surgery, radiological imaging and surgical treatment of aortic aneurysms.7, 8 Knowledge of the anatomical variations of Lumbar Arteries is important for surgi­cal operations involving the retroperitoneal region.9 Anatomical variations of the abdominal aorta should be considered by interventional radiologists before diagnostic imaging procedures like angiography and therapeutic procedures like transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.10

Aim

The aim of this study was to a) make morphometric mea­surements of AA and its branches, b) to investigate sites of origin of the branches, their relationships and variations.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted on 50 AA specimens that were obtained from human cadavers during autopsies at Guntur General Hospital from 2012 to 2013. These specimens of AA and its branches were measured with a metal scale morphometrically to determine diameter of Aorta and distances between branches (CT-AB, CT-SMA, SMA-IMA and IMA-AB) and the results were noted. The demographic char­acteristics of the cases (sex, age, height and weight) and any encountered variations and anomalies were recorded during the macroscopical observations.

Results

Out of 50 specimens taken for the study, 40 were males and 10 were females. The mean diameter of Aorta was studied at various levels and was illustrated in Table 2. The mean diameter of Aorta according to age and sex was studied and it was found that in all specimens at all levels in females is less than that of males and in both sexes diameters above 40 years are greater than below 40 years age group (Table 3). The study of Sonesson B et al. in 1994 concluded that there was a decrease in abdominal aortic wall distensibility with age and this occurs at earlier age in men.11

 Lederle, et al.12 analyzed the variation in aortic diameters measured with both CT and ultrasonography in 258 patients. The Ultrasound based measurements were smaller than the CT-based measurements by an average of 0.27 cm. But Wanhainen, et al.13  reported that Ultrasound based measurements were larger by 2.8 mm than CT-based measurements. The difference and variability of measurements between US and CT depends on the diameter of the aorta and how it is measured. 

With regard to the distance measurement, the present study shows the average distance from CT-AB, CT-SMA, SMA-IMA and IMA-AB were measured as 10.92cm, 0.67cm, 4.9cm, 3.27cm, respectively. The various lengths of Aortic segments at different levels were shown in Table 5.

The average length of Rt. Common iliac artery is 3.95cm whereas Lt. is 4.15cms, which shows Lt. is longer than Rt.

Many variations were observed in the study such as absence of left renal artery, bilateral accessory renal arteries, in few origin of one renal artery above the other, 3pairs of lumbar arteries etc., (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6).

Figure 1

Abdominal Aorta and its branches

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/530451af-1a99-4236-a3f3-aa1ac89d781b/image/757f9511-4c46-480b-ba0e-ba94c4bba026-uimage.png

Figure 2

Abdominal aorta and its branches

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/f4bd20d7-134d-4b5e-a316-dfc8cf6f8873image2.jpeg
Table 2

Mean diameter of aorta at various levels (in cms)

No. of specimens Level value
50 D1 1.27
50 D2 1.06
50 D3 1.20
50 D4 0.98
50 D5 0.99
50 D6 0.63
50 D7 0.49
Table 3

Mean diameter of abdominal aorta according to age and sex (in cms)

Diameter levels Less than 40 years age More than 40 years age
Male specimens (21) Female specimens (06) Male specimens (19) Female specimens (04)
D1 1.10 1.03 1.45 1.34
D2 0.979 0.838 1.21 1.08
D3 1.10 0.98 1.36 1.28
D4 0.9 0.8 1.136 1
D5 0.903 0.816 1.13 1.005
D6 0.570 0.513 0.734 0.607
D7 0.428 0.393 0.58 0.425
Table 4

Comparative measurements of proximal and distal Aorta and iliac vessels

Name of the Author & year Proximal Aorta (Supra Renal) Distal Aorta (Infra Renal) Common Iliac Artery
Pederson et al 1993 Below 50 Above 50 Below 50 Above 50 Below 50 Above 50
1.69 1.99 1.51 1.68 0.97 1.0
B Sonneson et al 1994 Below 40 Above 40 Below 40 Above 40 Below 40 Above 40
1.62 1.75
Present study 2012 1.12 1.44 1.07 1.34 0.56 0.71

Table 5

Lengths of aortic segments at different levelsin centimeters

Height of the cadaver L1(full length) L2Supra renal segment L3Infra renal Segment L4Coeliac to superiorMesenteric artery L5Superior Mesenteric artery to Bifurcation L6InferiorMesenteric artery toBifurcation
S.No Age Sex
Right left Right left
1 46 M 160 10.2 2.3 1.9 7.2 7.6 1.5 4.8 3.3
2 46 M 164 12 4.8 4.2 7 7.2 0.9 4.4 3.6
3 20 F 162 7.9 2.6 3 4.3 4 1.1 3 2.5
4 26 M 164 9.3 2 1.7 7 7.3 0 3.8 3.7
5 27 M 152 9.2 2.5 2 6.5 6.8 0.5 4.9 2.5
6 28 M 160 11.2 2.9 2.3 7.5 8.5 0.7 4.9 3.3
7 35 M 162 9.1 2.7 3 5.8 5.5 0.5 4.2 2.1
8 60 M 172 12.7 2.6 2.5 9.4 9.8 1 4.6 4.9
9 30 F 150 9.5 2 1.9 6.8 6.9 0.5 3.9 2.8
10 20 M 165 9.9 1.9 2 7.7 7.3 0.8 5.1 2.3
11 60 M 167 12.9 1.9 3.5 10.5 9 0.4 5.7 3.8
12 35 M 150 9.4 2.4 2.9 6.2 6 0.5 3.5 3.2
13 55 F 150 12 2.5 2.4 9.1 8.9 0.8 4.5 4.7
14 20 M 169 11 1.8 2.2 8.7 8.2 0.2 4.1 3.3
15 50 M 150 13.8 4.5 4.3 8.5 8.9 0 6.3 4.3
16 39 F 150 11.6 3.2 2.6 8.1 9.4 0.5 5 6.3
17 42 M 155 11.5 3.4 3.1 7.6 7.6 0.3 4.4 3.8
18 22 M 154 9.5 3.1 3.2 5.8 5.8 0.4 3.7 2.3
19 40 M 164 9.8 2.5 2.3 6.6 7 0.5 5 3
20 50 M 174 13.5 2.5 3.5 10.5 9.3 1.2 6.5 4.1
21 45 M 180 14.5 4.2 4 9.8 9.5 1.2 7.1 4.5
22 25 M 150 11.1 3.8 4.3 5.8 6.2 0.5 4.5 3.1
23 30 F 150 9.5 3.4 3.2 5.4 5.8 0.6 4.1 2.8
24 40 M 180 12 3.9 3.5 7.5 7.7 0.5 7 2.5
25 60 M 150 11.1 2.1 2.3 8.4 8.3 0.3 0 3.9
26 36 M 150 10 2.9 2.3 6.9 7.1 0 5.8 2.9
27 50 M 164 9.5 1.7 1.5 7.5 7.7 0.1 3.9 4
28 20 M 164 9.8 2.3 2.5 7.46 7.1 0.5 4.3 3.1
29 60 F 150 11.5 3.5 3.6 7.4 7.2 0.2 5.4 3
30 40 M 179 12.9 2.9 2.8 9.3 9.2 0.9 5.4 3.8
31 68 M 180 14.3 3.9 4.1 10.1 9.9 1.4 7.1 4
32 60 F 147 12.1 2.6 4.2 9.4 7.9 0.5 6.7 3
33 25 M 165 10.3 2.6 3.1 7.1 6.5 0.7 4.3 3
34 21 M 167 10.3 3.8 3.2 5.9 6.6 0.7 4.2 2.6
35 45 M 174 10.7 2.3 2.7 8.1 7.4 0.9 4.7 3.4
36 20 M 169 11.3 3.4 3.7 7.4 7.1 0.8 5.7 2.7
37 60 M 169 12.1 3.9 4.1 8.25 8.15 0.9 5.7 4
38 22 M 165 9.8 3.5 2.9 5.8 6.4 0.7 4.8 2.5
39 65 M 175 13.2 5.2 3.8 7.5 8.7 1 5.5 4.3
40 35 M 165 7.8 3.8 4 7.7 7.5 0.5 5.9 3
41 21 F 150 8.1 2.5 2.7 5.4 5 0.3 3.6 2.6
42 28 M 169 12.5 4 4.3 8 8.3 1 5.4 3.7
43 40 F 150 11.7 3.6 4.1 7.85 7.23 0.6 5.1 3.7
44 50 M 167 11.3 1.6 1.6 9.1 9 1 5 4
45 35 F 150 11.1 2.9 2.9 7.8 7.8 1.3 6.1 2.4
46 35 M 155 9.7 3.5 4 5.9 5.25 1 4.5 2.1
47 24 M 157 9.1 2.9 3.2 4.8 5.4 0.8 3.4 2.6
48 40 M 150 9.8 3.1 aa 8.3 aa 0.3 6.9 3.1
49 33 M 170 10.9 3.2 3 7.1 7.75 1 5.1 3.2
50 37 M 165 9.6 3.5 2.9 5.3 7.2 1 4.9 2.8

Figure 3

Origin of Lt. renal artery at lower level than Rt.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/530451af-1a99-4236-a3f3-aa1ac89d781b/image/96ebb318-79d0-4662-ab27-25b5b4098364-uimage.png

Figure 4

Origin of Lt. renal artery is at higher level than Rt

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/530451af-1a99-4236-a3f3-aa1ac89d781b/image/9acd1c15-1980-4957-8afe-64d711f04582-uimage.png

Figure 5

Aorta with absence of Lt. Renal artery

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/530451af-1a99-4236-a3f3-aa1ac89d781b/image/10c48318-f6c1-4896-996f-0f6d4d6c9955-uimage.png

Figure 6

Aorta with bilateral accessory renal arteries

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/530451af-1a99-4236-a3f3-aa1ac89d781b/image/dea4da1d-25cb-4f72-b06b-85208596cd94-uimage.png

Discussion

Now a day’s endovascular surgeries are very important in the management of different vascular problems. Of the many vessels, gross anatomical aspects of coronary, cerebral arteries, abdominal aorta and its branches are very important and were extensively studied by many authors.

PM Shah et al. studied the morphometry of abdominal aorta, its bifurcation and common iliac arteries. Their study revealed lengths of common iliac arteries which can be compared with present study. According to them, the length of right common iliac in males ranged between 8.2 cm – 3.3 cm with an average of 6cm and the left ranged between 7.6 – 3.8cm with an average of 5.8cm. Whereas in females the average length of right and left is 5.63cm and 5.4 cm respectively. This shows that right common iliac artery is lengthier than left common iliac arteries.

The present study showed the average lengths of right common iliac in males and females are 3.93cm and 4.10 cm respectively. In females, the right is 3.99cm and left is 4.34cm. This indicates the left common iliac is longer than the right. The present readings are in contradiction to the study of Shah et al.14

Ole martin Pedersen et al. and Sonesson B studied diameters of proximal and distal aortic segments and stated that as age advances the diameter of the distal aortic segment and iliac artery increases. Present study also revealed the same (Table 4).15, 16

According to the study of Ozan H et al., ostium of Rt. Renal artery was more cranial than that of left (53.3%) and in 10% both the ostia are at same level. In the present study, the ostium of Rt. Renal artery is cranial than that of left in 50% and the left renal artery is cranial to Rt in 46%. Both ostia are at same level in the remaining.17

Conclusion

To perform various surgical maneuvers a thorough knowledge of different parameters of AA is important. With the advent of noninvasive procedures such as ultrasonography, CT angiography, MR angiography it has become easy to study the variations and locate the lesion and proceed for surgical intervention. Though they give the morphometry, actual cadaveric measurements are also important for comparison.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

Nil.

References

1 

Christie Lech Anand Swaminathan Abdominal Aortic EmergenciesEmerg Med Clin N Am2017354847670733-8627Elsevier BV

2 

Henry Gray Anatomy of the human body. 20th ed602

3 

R S Snell Clinical Anatomy for Medical Students. 7th edLippincott Williams & Wilkins2003

4 

R. Deepthinath B. Satheesha Nayak R.B. Mehta Seetharama Bhat Vincent Rodrigues Vijaya Paul Samuel Multiple variations in the paired arteries of the abdominal aortaClin Anat200619656680897-3806, 1098-2353Wiley

5 

S Cavdar J Gurbuz A Zeybek U Sehirli L Abik O Ozdogmus A variation of coeliac trunkKaibogaku Zasshi1998735058

6 

Joshua Yahel Baruch Arensburg The topographic relationships of the unpaired visceral branches of the aortaClin Anat199811530490897-3806, 1098-2353Wiley

7 

H Ozan A Alemdaroglu A Sinav Y Gümüsalan Location of the ostia of the renal arteries in the aortaSurg Radiol Anat199719424570930-1038, 1279-8517Springer Science and Business Media LLC

8 

P. Bordei E. Şapte D. Iliescu Double renal arteries originating from the aortaSurg Radiol Anat200426647490930-1038, 1279-8517Springer Science and Business Media LLC

9 

Jack Baniel Richard S. Foster John P. Donohue Surgical Anatomy of the Lumbar Vessels: Implications for Retroperitoneal SurgeryJ Urol19951535142250022-5347, 1527-3792Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

10 

K Sridhar Varma N Pamidi V R Vollala S R Bolla Hepato-spleno-mesenteric trunk: A case reportRom J Morphol Embryol2010514012

11 

B Sonesson Sex difference in mechanical properties of abdominal aorta in human beings SOJ Vasc Surg199420695969

12 

F A Lederle S E Wilson G R Johnson D B Reinke F N Littooy C W Acher Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysmsJ Vasc Surg19952194552

13 

A. Wanhainen D. Bergqvist M. Björck Measuring the Abdominal Aorta with Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography – Difference and VariabilityEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2002245428341078-5884Elsevier BV

14 

P M Shah Geometric Anatomy of the Aortic - common iliac bifurcationJ Anat197812634518

15 

Ole Martin Pedersen M D Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular diseaseJ Vasc Surg1993173596601

16 

B Sonneson Infrarenal Aortic diameter in healthy person. SOEur J Vasc Surg199488995

17 

H Ozan Location of Ostea of renal arteries in the AortaSO: Surg Radiol Anat19971942457



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2020.031


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2352

PDF Downloaded: 1156