Get Permission Srivani D, Sreekanth C, Prathiba K, and Kumari M K: Quantitative analysis of morphometric variations of human spleen - A cadaveric study


Introduction

The spleen is one of the cardinal organs with overwhelming significance which did not get enough recognition it deserved. The spleen is a largest encapsulated collection of lymphoid tissue of human body that plays a significant role in extramedullary hematopoiesis & immune defense in fetal & adult life.2, 1 Spleen is situated in the left hypochondrium and in healthy adult humans is usually 12 cm long, 7 cm broad and 3–4 cm wide.2 The spleen is the most vascular organ in human body which receives 5 % of cardiac output and 40% source of the blood in the portal circulation.4, 3 According to harris dictum spleen measures spleen measures 1 x 3 x 5 inches, 7 oz weight, and relates to 9 through 11 ribs. In healthy adults, it is most frequently located between the tenth and twelfth ribs, with its long axis along the eleventh rib.6, 5 Its posterior border is approximately 4 cm from the midline at the level of the tenth thoracic vertebral spine and it extends about 3 cm anterior to the mid-axillary line The average adult weight is dependent on the volume of contained blood; emptied of blood, it weighs between 70 and 120 g, whereas in vivo its weight ranges from 150 to 350 g.8, 7, 4 The awareness of the morphology and morphometric dimensions of the spleen is of fundamental importance to the clinicians & surgeons. Thus a comprehensive study on the morphometric variations of spleen will provide insights in to diverse splenic pathologies which warrants the need for this study.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of the study is to perform detailed morphometric analysis human splenic specimens and compare the parameters with the existing literature.

Materials and Methods

The present study is a prospective type of study conducted in the department of Anatomy, S.V. Medical College, Tirupati. The ethical committee approval and consent of the relatives were obtained. During routine cadaveric dissection in department of Anatomy, S.V. Medical College, Tirupati, the spleen were collected. This includes 40 spleen specimens of both sexes ranging from 10 to 70 yrs. The spleen were observed insitu and then removed by routine dissection method and subjected to morphological & morphometric analysis. By using digimatic calipers (vernier–digital - MHUtoyo 6’’ mitutoyo), thread, measuring scale and the digital weighing balance, the following parameters were recorded.

  1. Length - measured between the splenic tips along diaphragmatic surface of spleen.

  2. Breadth - between superior and inferior border at a plane perpendicular to the length.

  3. Width - by using sliding digital calipers, maximum anterio-posterior dimension.

The collected data of both pre and postnatal age groups were subjected to statistical analysis by computing the mean of each parameter with respect to the age – wise groups by using SPSS 20 version (XL STAT). Student's t test, ANOVA & DMRT were used to compare the gender and morphometric parameters

Results and Analysis

The spleen were categorized in 6 groups as 0–19 Years, 20–29 Years, 30–39 Years, 40–49 Years, 50–59 Years and 60 – 69 Years. The largest group was samples with age 30-39 years with 11 specimens closely followed by 40-49 years group with 9 specimens. The gender-wise distribution is 75 % and 25 % for male and female groups respectively.

Age-wise correlation of splenic weight

The maximal splenic weight is seen in 30 -39 years age group (211 ±68 gm). Low splenic weights were observed in 10-19 years group and 60-69 years groups with latter being the lowest with mean splenic weight of 140± 22 gm.

The difference in splenic weight in relation to age is statistically insignificant (P value .15 and F value 1.73). The lowest and highest splenic weights observed were 150gm and 310 gm respectively.

The statistical one way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) were applied to the parameters of the spleen of different age groups revealed that the splenic weight gradually increases with age till 30-39 years and decreases thereafter with increasing age. The mean splenic weight in male samples is 178 ± 56 gm where as in females is 179 ± 54 gm.

Figure 1

Digimatic calipers & dissecting instruments

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/24083574-6f6f-4da6-9570-1a1513ce9d37image1.png

Figure 2

Showing spleens of different age groups

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/24083574-6f6f-4da6-9570-1a1513ce9d37image2.png

Table 1
Adults Age N Mean Std. Deviation F-value p-value Min Max
Splenic weight [gm] 0 - 19 years 3 168.333 27.5379 1.733 0.154 150.0 200.0
20 -29 years 6 166.667 58.4523 100.0 250.0
30 - 39 years 11 211.818 68.2376 130.0 310.0
40 - 49 years 9 185.000 50.6211 120.0 300.0
50 - 59 years 6 156.667 36.1478 120.0 200.0
60-69 years 5 140.000 22.3607 100.0 150.0
Total 40 178.500 55.0548 100.0 310.0
Length [cm] 0 - 19 years 3 10.100 0.3606 0.003 9.8 10.5
20 -29 years 6 10.567 1.1466 8.3 11.5
30 - 39 years 11 12.709 2.2775 10.0 15.5
40 - 49 years 9 13.711 2.1038 10.5 17.0
50 - 59 years 6 11.617 1.8027 9.9 14.5
60-69 years 5 10.000 0.7382 9.0 10.8
Total 40 11.915 2.1966 8.3 17.0
Breadth [cm] 0 - 19 years 3 7.167 0.9074 3.351* 0.014 6.2 8.0
20 -29 years 6 6.100 0.6899 5.0 7.0
30 - 39 years 11 8.527 2.7774 5.5 15.0
40 - 49 years 9 8.122 1.0756 6.5 9.7
50 - 59 years 6 6.633 0.5715 6.0 7.2
60-69 years 5 5.740 0.6229 5.0 6.5
Total 40 7.338 1.8929 5.0 15.0
Width [cm] 0 - 19 years 3 2.333 0.5859 4.707** 0.002 1.9 3.0
20 -29 years 6 3.000 0.5831 2.3 3.8
30 - 39 years 11 3.718 0.7998 2.4 5.5
40 - 49 years 9 3.944 0.6930 3.2 5.6
50 - 59 years 6 3.517 0.4309 3.0 4.0
60-69 years 5 2.840 0.3847 2.4 3.3
Total 40 3.417 0.7834 1.9 5.6

Summary of ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) in postnatal group by age and morphological parameters

The maximal splenic length was in 40-49 years group with mean 8.5 cm ±2.7 cm with gradual and significant increase with age till 40 -49 years and declines gradually there afterwards. The mean splenic length observed was 11.9 ±2.1 cm. The minimal and maximal splenic lengths observed were 8.3 and 1 7 cm respectively.

The maximal splenic breadth was in 30-39 years group with mean 13 cm ±2.1 cm with gradual and significant increase (P value 0.01 and F value of 3.35) with age till 30 -39 years and declines significantly thereafter. The lowest splenic breadth was observed in 60-69 years age group with mean breadth 5.7 ±0.62 cm. The average splenic breadth observed was 7.33 ±1.89 cm. The minimal and maximal splenic breadths observed were 5 and 15 cm respectively.

The maximal splenic width was in 40-49 years group with mean 3.9 cm ±0.69 cm with gradual and highly significant increase (P value 0.002 and F value of 4.7) with age till 40 -49 years and declines significantly thereafter. The lowest splenic width was observed in 0-19years age- group with mean width 2.3 ±0.58 cm. The average splenic width observed was 3.4 ±0.78 cm. The minimal and maximal splenic width observed were 1.9 and 5.6 cm respectively.

The ANOVA correlation shows morphometric parameters splenic length, breadth and width steadily varied with age and the difference is highly significant (P values 0.003, 0.014 and 0.002 respectively) for length and width.

Correlation of splenic weight, length, breadth and width with gender

The difference in splenic weight in relation to gender was statistically insignificant (P value 0.9 and t value 0.06). The mean splenic length, breadth and width followed the same pattern as splenic weight in relation to gender without any statistically significant difference.

Table 2
Postnatal Gender N Mean Std. Deviation t-value p-value
Splenic weight [gm] Male 30 178.167 56.2550 0.065 0.948
Female 10 179.500 54.1833
Length [cm] Male 30 12.213 2.2752 1.512 0.139
Female 10 11.020 1.7441
Breadth [cm] Male 30 7.303 1.5348 0.195 0.846
Female 10 7.440 2.8143
Width [cm] Male 30 3.520 .8100 1.453 0.154
Female 10 3.110 .6367

Independent sample t -test by gender for morphometric parameters in postnatal group

Observation of linear correlation between morphometric parameters

The pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for degree of linear dependence calculated for splenic weight, length, breadth and width in postnatal group showed significant positive correlation between splenic weight and splenic length, breadth and width (Pearson coefficient 0.51, 0.70 and 0.51 respectively).

The splenic length correlated with breadth and width in positive direction. However the maximal correlation dependence was observed between the splenic weight and the breadth (Pearson coefficient 0.70) and the least dependence was observed between splenic length and breadth (Pearson coefficient 0.48). The splenic weight, length and breadth steadily increased with age and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.05, High F value) for length, width and significant for breadth.

Discussion

Correlation of splenic weight with age

In the present study the average splenic weight observed was 178.5 gms. The splenic weight ranged from 100 to 300 gms which appears close to the normal range of 80 to 300 gms and an average of 150gms described in the previous studies done by Chaudhari ML,9 Rao et al,10 Charware et al11 and from the descriptions in the standard literature by Gray5, 1.

Table 3
Splenic weight Present study Chaudhari ML et al9 Rao et al10 Charware et al11 Gray’s anatomy
Average 178.5 gm 150 gm 138.4 gm 150 gm 150 gm
Range 100-300 gm 80-350 gm 30-325 gm 80-300 gm 80-300 gm

Correlation of weight of spleen with various studies

Observations of splenic length, breadth and width

In the present study, the lengths of the spleens varies from8.3 cm to 17 cm, with an average length of 11.915 ± 2.19 cm. The observations in the present study were in accordance with the studies of Chaudhari ML et al9, Charware et al11, Michels NA12, Rayhan KA13.

Table 4
Splenic length Present study Chaudhari ML et al9 Rao et al10 Charware et al11 Gray’s anatomy1,5 Michels NA12 Rayhan KA13
Average 11.9 cm 9.59 cm 10.15cm 9.66 cm 12 cm 11 cm 9.83 cm
Minimum 8.3 cm 6 cm 7.5 cm 5 cm 6 cm 7.1 cm
Maximum 17 cm 14 cm 15.5 cm 13 cm 15 cm 13 cm
Correlation of breadth of spleen with various studies
Splenic breadth Present study Chaudhari ML et al9 Rao et al10 Charware et al11 Gray’s anatomy1,5 Michels NA12 Rayhan KA13
Average 7.33 cm 6.58 cm 8.3 cm 6.2 cm 7 cm 7 cm 5.46 cm
Minimum 5 cm 3.5 cm 4.5 cm 3.5 cm 4 cm 2.9 cm
Maximum 15 cm 8.5 cm 12.5 cm 9.5 cm 11.5 cm 8.2 cm
Correlation of width of spleen with various studies
Splenic width Present study Chaudhari ML et al9 Rao et al10 Charware et al11 Gray’s anatomy1,5 Michels NA12 Rayhan KA13
Average 3.4 cm 4.5 cm 3.96 cm 3.06 cm 3-4 cm 3 cm 2 cm
Minimum 1.9 cm 2 cm 2 cm 1.5 cm 2 cm 0.8 cm
Maximum 5.6 cm 7 cm 6 cm 5.5 cm 5 cm 3.3 cm

Correlation of length of spleen with various studies

The breadth of the spleen varied from 5 cm to 15 cm, with an average of 7.33 cm. The width of the spleen varies from 1.9 cm to 5.6 cm with an average of 3.4 cm. These observations of breadth & width were in accordance with the studies of Chaudhari ML et al,9 Rao et al,10 Charware et al,11 Michels NA,12 Rayhan KA.13

The mean values of the length, breadth, and width of the spleen in our study were, 11.9 cm, 7.33 cm and 3.4 cm respectively which correlated with the parameters described in the standard literature. There was a significant positive correlation between splenic weight and splenic length, breadth, width (Pearson coefficient 0.51, 0.70 and 0.51 respectively.

The morphometric parameters splenic weight, length and breadth steadily increased with age and the difference is highly significant (P < 0.05, High F value) for length, width and significant for breadth. This observation differed with the study of Rayhan KA13 who noticed a statistically insignificant association between age and morphometric parameters.

Table 5
Age Present study Splenic volume Sitthipong Srisajjakul et al (2012) 14
0 – 19 Years 102.06 cc 156.6 cc (89.80 - 430.85)
20 – 29 Years 115.6 cc
30 – 39 Years 219.3 cc 131.5 cc (52.20-244.25)
40 – 49 Years 236.5 cc 127.9 cc (53.05-233.10)
50 – 59 Years 153.58 cc 118.1 cc (40.30-231.55)
60 – 69 Years 112.42 cc 119.5 cc (38.85-336.55)

Correlation of volume of spleen with various studies

The maximal splenic length, breadth and thickness in the present study were observed in 40-49 years age group. There was a gradual and statistically significant increase of length, breadth and width with age till 40-49 years and declines significantly there afterwards, an observation in accordance with the findings of Rayhan KA. This pattern was not observed in relation to weight of the spleen with age.

The similar observations were described by N Arora etal16, 15 with ultrasound measured dimensions of spleen, where the splenic parameters length, breadth and width decreased with increasing age above 40. They observed rapid growth in the splenic length up to the age of 20 years followed by a mild decrease up to the age of 50 years and then rapid fall after the age of 50 years.

In the present study, the mean splenic length, breadth, width and weight showed a statistically insignificant difference between male and female groups which differed with the observation of N Arora et al16, 15 who noticed the parameters were significantly higher in males.

However, the slight differences in the morphometric parameters with respect to previous studies may be attributed to the genetic factors, body constitution, geographical conditions, dietary habits and the socioeconomic status of the population where these studies were done.

Splenic volume in postnatal group

The splenic volume was calculated by formula 19.6+ 0.5(length x breadth x width) from observations of Sitthipong Srisajjakul et al (2012).

The average splenic volume in the present study was 167.27 cc. The calculated splenic volume in different age groups was similar to the observations of Sitthipong Srisajjakul et al14 (2012) where the average splenic volume was 124.1 ± 51.8 cc . In the present study there was a significant increase in splenic volume till 40-49 years and steady decline afterwards.

Conclusion

The data regarding the various splenic parameters collected and analyzed in the present study emphasized the significance of morphometric dimensions of spleen in diagnosing various infectious, inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. The intricate knowledge of dimensions and morphometric variations of the spleen are of fundamental importance to the Hematologists, radiologists, prosectors and surgeons during surgical procedures on spleen.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Susan Standring Gray’s Anatomy, The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th edElsevier Churchill Livingstone Publications200811161117

2 

Amy Chadburn The spleen: Anatomy and anatomical functionSemin Hematol20003711321

3 

Mark F. Cesta Normal Structure, Function, and Histology of the SpleenToxicol Pathol2006345455465

4 

Panagiotis N. Skandalakis Gene L. Colborn Lee John Skandalakis Daniel Dale Richardson William E. Mitchell John E. Skandalakis The Surgical Anatomy of the SpleenSurg Clin North Am1993734747768

5 

H Gray January 9, 1855On the Structure and Use of the SpleenJohn W. Parker and SonLondon1854153

6 

Adalet Elcin Yildiz Macit Orhan Ariyurek Musturay Karcaaltincaba Splenic Anomalies of Shape, Size, and Location: Pictorial EssaySci World J201321910.1155/2013/321810

7 

Takefumi Nakamura Fuminori Moriyasu Nobuyuki Ban Osamu Nishida Takashi Tamada Toshihiko Kawasaki Quantitative measurement of abdominal arterial blood flow using image-directed Doppler ultrasonography: Superior mesenteric, splenic, and common hepatic arterial blood flow in normal adultsJ Clin Ultrasound1989174261268

8 

P. Prassopoulos M. Daskalogiannaki M. Raissaki A. Hatjidakis N. Gourtsoyiannis Determination of normal splenic volume on computed tomography in relation to age, gender and body habitusEuropean Radiology1997722462480938-7994, 1432-108410.1007/s003300050145Springer Science and Business Media LLChttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050145

9 

M L Chaudhari P B Maheria C Lakhani V R Menezes Morphological Variations of Human Spleen and its Clinical SignificanceInt J Med Res Rev2014211616

10 

Sivanageswara Rao Raja Sekhar Katikireddi Morphometric Study of Human SpleenInt J Biol Med Res20134334643468

11 

P N Charware S M Belsare Y R Kulkarni S V Pandit J M Ughade The Morphological Variations of the Human SpleenJ Clin Diagn Res201262159162

12 

Nicholas A. Michels The variational anatomy of the spleen and splenic arteryAm J Anat19427012172

13 

K A Rayhan S Ara Nurunnabi Asm Morphometric study of the post mortem human spleenJ Dhaka med coll20112013236

14 

M D Sitthipong Srisajjakul M Patcharin Prapaisilp Sc M D Nonglak Laorratkul Normal Splenic Volume Assessment on CT in 426 AdultsSiriraj Med J2012644346

15 

Neetu Arora P.K. Sharma Ashok Sahai Ragini Singh Sonographic measurement of the spleen: splenic length in adults and its correlation with different parametersJ Anatomical Soc India20136215761

16 

Darwish Badran Heba Kalbouneh Maher Al-Hadidi Amjad Shatarat Emad Tarawneh Azmy Hadidy Ultrasonographic assessment of splenic volume and its correlation with body parameters in a Jordanian populationSaudi Med J2015368967972



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2020.015


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1612

PDF Downloaded: 745