Get Permission Kumar and Gugapriya: Radio anatomical analysis of positional relation between anterior ethmoid artery canal and ethmoid skull base in correlation with olfactory fossa


Introduction

Skull base (SB) injuries happens mostly either in the thinnest or the least resistant part of SB.1 The region of thin and less resistant lateral lamella of cribriform plate had been proposed as the common site of injury during endoscopic anterior skull base surgeries.4, 3, 2 During functional endoscopic sinus surgery involving the anterior skull base, the anterior ethmoid artery (AEA) visualization is considered as a significant anatomical landmark.8, 7, 6, 5

AEA originates in the anterior third of orbital cavity from ophthalmic artery and courses through the medial orbital wall by entering the anterior ethmoid foreman. It further passes through ethmoid sinus either freely or within a bony canal and exits commonly by penetrating the lateral lamella of cribriform plate.10, 9 Inconsistent course of AEA coupled with thin lateral lamella of cribriform plate was noted to result in complications like leakage of CSF, intra orbital retraction of artery and orbital hematoma with bleeding during endoscopic surgeries due to unwarranted injury.20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11

A study had shown that visualizing AEA during endoscopic surgeries specifically prevents iatrogenic complications associated with such endoscopic procedures.21 AEA remains as the critical structure of identification in upper skull base procedures and also in accessing frontal sinus.13

Positional relation of AEA to SB particularly in low ethmoid roof had been reported.22, 18, 1 Studies have found a directly proportional relation between AEA and SB distance.24, 23 However, studies correlating this positional relation with morphology of olfactory fossa remains limited. This study aims to look into the relation of AEA to that of ethmoid skull base in different types of olfactory fossa morphology.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective radiological study was done on 100 coronal CT images from patients who were subjected to paranasal CT imaging during a period April-July 2018 in a tertiary health care setup. All CT images, even with evidence of sinusitis were included in the study. The exclusion being altered skull base anatomy due to previous surgical intervention, trauma or tumour and age less than 18 years. The images were analysed using RadiAnt Dicom viewer. In bone window of coronal CT scans, the position of AEA in relation to SB was noted. It was classified as at SB or below SB on each side. The vertical distance from AEA to SB was measured individually if the AEA was found to be below SB. Based on the distance of AEA from SB, 3 groups were subdivided as follows: Group A - < 2.5 mm, Group B – 2.5 to 5 mm and Group C - > 5 mm (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Showing AEA, SB. Greenline- indicates the vertical distance between AEA and SB

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/3912fe11-8013-4605-b2e3-d31a6d2d56ce-uimage.png

The depth of the olfactory fossa was measured with reference to length of the lateral lamella of cribriform plate and categorized according to Keros classification as Keros type I – 1to 3 mm, type II – 4 to 7 mm and type – III – 8 to 16 mm (Figure 2).25

The data were statistically analysed using SPPS software. The chi-square test was applied to relate the distance between AEA and SB and the depth of olfactory fossa. P value of < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The study was undertaken after approval from institutional ethical committee.

Figure 2

Showing Keros classification of olfactory fossa. Red line is the lateral lamella

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/163ffd5d-0bae-4eb2-b6f2-fe1f55d8ce6a-uimage.png

Results

Among the coronal CT images analyzed, the male and female were noted to be 67 and 33 respectively.

Out of 200 sides, AEA was identified in all the images studied (100%). The AEA was found below SB in 167 out of 200 (83.5%). On measuring the distance between the AEA and SB majority belonged to Group A (101 out of 167) (Figure 3) in comparison to Group B (56 out of 167) (Figure 4) and Group C (10 out of 167) (Figure 5). The mean distance was found to be 1.43 mm, 3.8 mm, 5.72 mm in Group A, Group B and Group C respectively. The overall mean distance be tween the AEA and the SB was 3.65 mm.

Figure 3

Showing AEA belonging to Group A

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/a44cd79f-930d-4a6f-8a99-a8c4ab551cd6-uimage.png

Figure 4

Showing AEA belonging to Group B

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/90d7287e-c383-4a3c-9d88-6f5d189adb67-uimage.png

Figure 5

Showing AEA belonging to Group C

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/4ff8675d-6638-4002-8cad-be9f235ffdcb-uimage.png

Figure 6

Showing AEA at SB

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/3eb9e6b1-c0dc-4236-afa2-72f5068543eb-uimage.png

CT images showing AEA below the SB was observed commonly to have type II Keros classification. The unobserved type was Keros type III in this study (Table 1). AEA was observed at the SB (Figure 6) in 33 out of 200 sides (16.5%). In this group also kero’s type III was noted to be absent (Table 1).

On applying Chi-square test for comparing the position of AEA and Keros classification, the P value was significant (P = .006) (Table 1). The position of AEA below SB was seen at a greater frequency as the height of SB increased with the Keros classification (Table 1).

Table 1
AEA below SB AEA at SB (Figure 6 )
Keros Type I 63 (70.14) [0.73] 21 (13.86) [3.68]
Keros Type II 104 (96.86) [0.53] 12 (19.14) [2.66]
Keros Type III 0 0

Distribution of Keros classification with AEA below and at SB

[i] The chi-square statistic is 7.5948. The p-value is .005854. The result is significant at p < .05

On comparing the relational distance between AEA and SB and the depth of olfactory fossa (Table 2), data revealed that Keros type II was the most frequent type present among all the groups. Chi-square test was applied to see the correlation between the groups and the P value calculated was > 0.05. This indicated a statistically insignificant relation between the groups.

Table 2
Keros type I Keros Type II Keros Type III Total
Group A 38  (38.10)  [0.00] 63  (62.90)  [0.00] 0 101
Group B 23  (21.13)  [0.17] 33  (34.87)  [0.10] 0 56
Group C 2  (3.77)  [0.83] 8  (6.23)  [0.50] 0 10
Total 63 104 0 167

Relation between AEA to SB distance and Keros classification (olfactory fossa depth)

[i] The chi-square statistic is 1.6047. The p-value is .448277. The result is not significant at p < .05.

Discussion

The AEA is an anato-radiologic keystone for endoscopic surgeries on paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base surgeries. Observation of AEA in all the images analysed in the present study stands out in agreement to reported range between 92-100%.17, 13, 10, 9

AEA was known to exhibit a variable course in the ethmoidal air sinus. It was noted at SB in 16.5% and below SB in 83.5% which correlates with earlier studies showing 20% and 80%, 32.7% and 67.3% respectively.15, 14 The comparison of distance between AEA and SB among different authors shows that group A is seen commonly except in one study where group C was observed to be predominant (Figure 7).20, 15, 14, 5 The overall mean distance between the AEA and SB was 3.65 mm which is comparable to the mean value of 3.18 mm and 4.86 mm reported in previous studies.23, 14

Chart 1

Showing comparison of distance between AEA and ethmoid skull base

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/caa59806-ea66-4936-abe1-e8bb630ad880-uimage.png

The depth of olfactory fossa is an important guiding landmark for endoscopic surgeons. Except a study that showed kero’s type I as the predominant type, rest all previous reports including the present study observed Kero’s type II in predominance (Figure 8).28, 27, 26, 23, 20

Chart 2

Showing comparison of percentage incidence of olfactory fossa depth (Keros classification)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b3f72449-1666-41ed-a2b9-146552145a9f/image/cd1618ad-cb4c-4830-9361-17faf4b107ea-uimage.png

Increased depth of olfactory fossa increases the probability of AEA coursing freely within ethmoid sinus.10, 9 AEA canal distance from SB increases in a definitive manner with an increase in the depth of olfactory fossa. The probability of iatrogenic injury to AEA increases in such cases. In the contrary, present finding of majority of the AEA coursing very close to the skull base < 2.5 mm indicates a safer course and less chance of injury during interventions.

Apart from the relation to lateral lamellar height that could change the position of AEA, the pneumatization of ethmoid air cells and presence of large supraorbital cell has been attributed as reason for variability in the position of AEA with relation to SB. Kero’s type along with ethmoid pneumatization was proposed as predictive factor in determining the relational distance between AEA and SB.29, 14, 13, 10 Study of this causative relation was beyond the scope of the present study.

Limitation

  1. Limited sample size might be the reason for less statistical power seen in the analysis.

  2. The incidence of supraorbital pneumatization, superorbital cell and their relation to positional variation of AEA.

Conclusion

The distance between AEA and SB differs due to difference in length of lateral lamella of cribriform fossa. Variation in olfactory fossa morphology does exist. The positional relationship between AEA and depth of olfactory fossa stands significant in spite of statistical limitation observed. The knowledge of presence of anterior ethmoid artery outside the skull base with long lateral lamella preoperatively would help the surgeon to avoid intraoperative complication s during endoscopic skull base or sinus surgeries.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

Josef Kainz Heinz Stammberger The Roof of the Anterior Ethmoid: A Place of Least Resistance in the Skull BaseLaryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)198867142149

2 

Josef Kainz Heinz Stammberger The Roof of the Anterior Ethmoid: A Place of Least Resistance in the Skull BaseAm J Rhinol198934191199

3 

H Stammberger Complications of Inflammatory Sinus Diseases Including Iatrogenic ComplicationsEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol-Rhino-Laryngol199362102

4 

Toshio Ohnishi Eiji Yanagisawa Lateral Lamella of the Cribriform Plate—An Important High-Risk Area in Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryEar Nose Throat J19957410688690

5 

Y B Ko M G Kim Y G Jung The anatomical relationship between the anterior ethmoid artery, frontal sinus, and intervening air cells; can the artery be useful landmarkKorean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg20145710687691

6 

Wai Chung Lee Peter Ka Ming Ku Charles Andrew van Hasselt New Guidelines for Endoscopic Localization of the Anterior Ethmoidal Artery: A Cadaveric StudyThe Laryngoscope2000110711731178

7 

Gökhan Akdemir Ibrahim Tekdemir Levent Altın Transethmoidal approach to the optic canal: Surgical and radiological microanatomySurg Neurol2004623268274

8 

Metin Bayram Akif Sirikci Yıldırım A. Bayazıt Important anatomic variations of the sinonasal anatomy in light of endoscopic surgery: a pictorial reviewEuropean Radiol2001111019911997

9 

J. A. Kirchner E. Yanagisawa E. S Crelin Surgical Anatomy of the Ethmoidal Arteries: A Laboratory Study of 150 OrbitsArch Otolaryngol1961744382386

10 

S K Chung H J Dhong H Y Kim Computed tomography anatomy of the anterior ethmoid canalAm J Rhinol20011527781

11 

H Stammberger Stammberger H Hawke M Endoscopic anatomy of lateral wall and ethmoidal sinusesEssentials of functional endoscopic sinus surgeryMosby-Year Book19931342

12 

Toshio Ohnishi Eiji Yanagisawa Lateral Lamella of the Cribriform Plate—An Important High-Risk Area in Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryEar Nose Throat J19957410688690

13 

Soraia Ale Souza Marcia Maria Ale de Souza Luís Carlos Gregório Sergio Ajzen Anterior Ethmoidal Artery Evaluation on Coronal CT ScansBraz J Otorhinolaryngol2009751101106

14 

Anagha A. Joshi Kshitij D. Shah Renuka A. Bradoo Radiological correlation between the anterior ethmoidal artery and the supraorbital ethmoid cellIndian J Otolaryngol2010623299303

15 

B P Sah Radiological correlation between the anterior ethmoidal artery and the supraorbital ethmoid cell in relation to skull baseA Ad Med Sc201821115

16 

A Seker C Martins A L Rhoton Meningeal anatomyMeningiomas120101151

17 

S. B. Amarnath P. Suresh Kumar Study of variants of anterior ethmoidal artery on computed tomography of paranasal sinusesInt J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg2018511923

18 

H J Moon H U Kim J G Lee Surgical anatomy of the anterior ethmoidal canal in ethmoid roofLaryngoscope20011115900904

19 

F. Cankal N. Apaydin H.I. Acar A. Elhan I. Tekdemir M. Yurdakul Evaluation of the anterior and posterior ethmoidal canal by computed tomographyClin Radiol2004591110341040

20 

B Abdullah Anatomical variations of anterior ethmoidal artery at the ethmoidal roof and anterior skull base in AsiansSurg Radiol Anat2018118

21 

Toshio Ohnishi Toshiro Tachibana Yukie Kaneko Shiro Esaki High-Risk Areas in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Prevention of ComplicationsLaryngoscope19931031011811185

22 

Stephen P. Becker Applied Anatomy of the Paranasal Sinuses with Emphasis on Endoscopic SurgeryAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl19941034_suppl332

23 

Perry S. Poteet Matthew D. Cox Ran A. Wang Ryan T. Fitzgerald Alissa Kanaan Analysis of the Relationship between the Location of the Anterior Ethmoid Artery and Keros ClassificationOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg2017157320324

24 

A Yenigun A study of the anterior ethmoidal artery and a new classification of the ethmoid roof (Yenigun classification)Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol20162731137593764

25 

P Keros On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoidZ Laryngol Rhinol Otol196241809813

26 

Justin Elfred Lan B. Paber Michael Salvador D. Cabato Romeo L. Villarta Josefino G. Hernandez Radiographic Analysis of the Ethmoid Roof based on KEROS Classification among FilipinosPhil J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg20082311519

27 

S Nair Importance of ethmoidal roof in endoscopic sinus surgerySci Rep20121413

28 

Hatice Kaplanoglu Veysel Kaplanoglu Alper Dilli Ugur Toprak Baki Hekimoglu An Analysis of the Anatomic Variations of the Paranasal Sinuses and Ethmoid Roof Using Computed TomographyEurasian J Med2013452115125

29 

D Simmen The surgeons view of the anterior ethmoid arteryClin Otolaryngol2006313187191



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2020.012


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2583

PDF Downloaded: 762