Get Permission Lohitashwa, Soumya B A, and Suneeta K: Effects and impact of an innovative pair and share learning strategy on academic performance of slow learners in I MBBS


Introduction

A slow learner is the one who has the ability to learn necessary academic skills but at a rate & depth below average of the same age peers.1 Identifying a slow learner student early is always important as sometimes high performing students fail to perform well after entering into medical colleges. One of the known facts is that during the course of an hour long lecture, attention is at its peak only during the first 10 to 20 minutes. Later on very little is recalled after more than 20 minutes of continuous concentration.2 Because of the increase in demands for a lifetime of continuing medical education, future medical doctors should take responsibility for their own learning.

These facts also make us understand that a pedagogic shift in higher education from the traditional teacher centered to the student centered approach in teaching is required and the role of teachers needs to be changed from suppliers of information to facilitators of leaning.

Educational research has identified the potential advantage of interactivity that promotes mentally active learning & improved learning outcomes. A very well established theory explains that adult learners are motivated when learning is participatory and actively involves them in functioning and reflecting on problems that are seemingly relevant.3

Active learning strategies are supported by adult learning theories and have also been shown to be beneficial for long term learning and the development of self directed learning skills.5, 4 Pair & share is a cooperative learning technique. Cooperative learning allows students the opportunity to work together to build a meaningful understanding of subject material.6 The objective of the study was to analyze the effects and impact of an innovative pair and share learning strategy on academic performance of slow learners.

Objectives

  1. To study the effects of innovative Pair & Share learning strategy on academic performances of Slow Learner in I MBBS.

  2. To gather perception of students involved in the intervention about innovative method.

Materials and Methods

After obtaining the ethical committee clearance, an educational intervention was done in the department of Physiology. Informed consent was obtained by the study group. Following a formative assessment (I Internal Assessment) for MBBS I students in Physiology, the struggling students were identified with a score of <35%. 42 students were involved. They were given the topics for discussion & be prepared for tutorials. On the day of tutorials, students were paired & instructed to discuss their topics with each other. After the discussion time of 20 minutes, they were asked to present their pair’s topic in front of the group. The activity included pretest and post test. The feedback questionnaires were validated and included with five point Likert scale.

For Statistical analysis, the Student’s paired t-test was employed to compare the mean marks of the different groups. The data was analyzed by using the SPSS and p values <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Table 1
(n= 42) Mean + SD p Value
Pretest Score 5.1 + 1.90 0.855
Posttest Score 5.82 + 1.95

Comparison of pretest and post test

Figure 1

Students feedback on effects of innovative Pair & Share learning strategyL1 - This method of learning module was enjoyable and fun as it generated more fun and interest in learning

L2 - This method of learning module can help me improve my knowledge

L3 - This method of learning module can help me to understand and remember specific information and ideas effectively

L4 - Increasing the frequency of this method of learning module can help increase individual thinking and interest

L5 - This method of learning module can help me improve self efficacy

L6 - This method of learning module can impart positive effects mediated through observation and peer feedback

L7 - I experienced problems during the process of learning

L8 - This learning module was too long and required too much time

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/4545d5e0-5f45-4a51-b962-40e347192f83image1.png

Figure 2

Students satisfaction with Innovative Pair & Share learning strategy

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/7f5f0b5f-ca32-4fac-bfbc-a94bbb596ff0/image/f27e885c-d85c-48d1-b536-5bc97a5f8a09-uimage.png

Discussion

Every student has his/her learning style. A learning style is a student's steady way of responding to and using stimuli in the context of learning. Learning is defined as the composite of characteristic cognitive, affective and physiological factors that serve as an indicator of how a learner perceives, interacts with and responds to the learning environment.7 It is always necessary for the learner to know his strength or weakness and to decide on a prop er learning strategy.7

In the present study, there was some improvement in the posttest scores but this was not statistically significant. Majority of students agreed that this method may help them to improve their knowledge and also to impart positive effects mediated through observation and peer feedback.

Students expressed satisfaction with implementation of innovative pair & share learning module. They also agreed that this method of learning module was enjoyable and fun as it generated more interest in learning.

Learning takes place from uncomplicated to complicate. If for some reason the student has not learnt the basics, it is pointless to teach him the higher topics. Innovative Pair and Share learning technique can help enhance cognition. Cautious analysis of the students' performance in the examination, diagnosing difficulty areas and identifying an ideal pair to share the knowledge can be the key aspects in the success of innovative pair and share technique of learning. Once the difficult areas are identified, we need to plan the learning experiences to teach the basics to understand the given topic.8 It is very teacher’s belief that the foundation needs to be strong at the primary level so that the next levels of learning can be built upon with much ease. It is by experience that we have learnt, once the basics are taught, the learning process is accelerated and the slow learners can comprehend and grasp the given topics of the class to understand the topics taught.9

Resolving underachievement teaches us a great deal about learning, and makes teaching as rewarding as it gets.10 So if a student is to be judged he is compared with the progress he has made and not the general result of the entire class.12, 11

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Suranjana Ray Ujjani Ray Manas Kanti Ray Peer Tutoring as a Remedial Measure for Slow Learners in a Medical SchoolJKIMSU201541

2 

A Long B Lock Swanwick T Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Seconded. The Association for the Study of Medical EducationWiley-Blackwell2013137185

3 

J. A Spencer R. K Jordan Learner centred approaches in medical educationBMJ19993187193128012833

4 

David C. M. Taylor Hossam Hamdy Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83Med Teach20133511e1561e1572

5 

Ben Graffam Active learning in medical education: Strategies for beginning implementationMed Teach20072913842

6 

Heidi L. Lujan Stephen E. DiCarlo Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution?Adv Physiol Educ2006301172210.1152/advan.00061.2005

7 

J W Keefe J.W. Keefe Learning style: An overviewStudent Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs1979Reston, VA117

8 

Anderson Ra P T Wilson J Osborn What they don't know will hurt them: the role of prior knowledge in comprehensionLexington Books1986319328

9 

J Blanchard Up close and personalised—boosting creativity and individual learning’, Curriculum Briefing: Restructuring learning—changing curriculumsOptimus Educ200753

10 

K. J. Topping The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literatureHigher Educ1996323321345

11 

B S Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. ChicagoSusan Fauer Co1956

12 

Alison Crowe Clarissa Dirks Mary Pat Wenderoth Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in BiologyCBE Life Sci Educ200874368381



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijcap.2020.004


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2273

PDF Downloaded: 714