Introduction
There were differences in the ways anatomists and radiologists approach cross-sectional anatomy. If learning cross-sectional anatomy and subsequent imaging anatomy are in the same orientation, a potential scope for wrong identification of the side can be avoided. This manuscript tries to point out the steps taken by anatomists to integrate teaching of Anatomy with clinical teaching.
Table 1
Sectional anatomy has had a long history, enjoyed wide popularity during 19th century, but its application to study anatomy declined during early 20th century. It cannot be said with certainty who had started the study of cross-sectional anatomy, but it was used in 16th century, which was evident from the drawings of Leonardo da Vinci.1
With the advent of radiological techniques, such as Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), cross-sectional anatomy regains its importance. It is not only mandatory for the radiologists, but also for the surgeons, physicians, students of Anatomy to learn cross-sectional anatomy in order to interpret these images and provide quality health care for the patients.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Knowledge of cross-sectional Anatomy helps the students to get a three dimensional view of the organs, their relationship with one another, retaining the information for a longer duration.2, 4, 6
The books which were published earlier displayed the cross-sectional anatomy images as viewed from the head end down as it was considered as rational standard/clinical position.7 As per the standard Anatomical Position, the structures and their relations of various organs are described even when the body is lying on the back in the bed, or in the dissecting table, assuming as if the person is standing upright with the feet together and the head and eyes are looking to the front, with the arms straight by the side and the palms of the hands facing forwards. I assume that this may be the reason for describing the cross-sectional images from the head end in those days.
Albert Einstein said, “I never teach my pupils, I only provide the conditions in which they can learn.” Thus to meet the demands of the students learning cross-sectional anatomy to identify the structures in CT, MRI where the equipment produces images as viewed from the foot end up, the authors of the Anatomy and Cross-sectional Anatomy books have changed their approach and nowadays, in all the atlases, the orientation of the image is in line with the CT/MRI axial images.2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
“A Cross sectional Anatomy” by C. Eycleshymer A, M. Schoemaker D.(published in 1911), projected the cross-sections from the head end. Even the Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy upto the 15th edition also displayed the cross-sections from the head end. But the recent edition (16th edition) displays the cross-sections from the foot end.
To summarise, the cross-sections of thorax, abdomen were described from foot end by most of the textbooks, while the cross-sections of the extremities and brain were given in different patterns in different textbooks and for some of the cross-sections through neck and extremities, the orientation was not mentioned.
Identifying a correct side is important in the medical practice. For example, when an externally invisible unilateral tumour requiring surgical excision is diagnosed, there should not be any error of identifying the correct side. If learning cross sectional anatomy and subsequent imaging anatomy are in the same orientation, a potential scope for wrong identification of the side can be avoided.
The front cover of the 41st edition of Gray’s Anatomy, The Anatomical basis of Clinical Practice shows the image of orientation of the white fibres in the brain using “Advanced Diffusion Tractography”. For me, this implies that the anatomists understood the need to revise the traditional methods of teaching anatomy and to integrate with other basic sciences and clinical teaching.