- Visibility 80 Views
- Downloads 19 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijcap.2022.020
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Three-dimensional (3D) printing: A potentially versatile tool in the field of medicine
Introduction
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a fast-developing technology that offers a wealth of teaching-learning resources and applications in the modern medical field. It is also known by the name additive manufacturing. In this process, a three-dimensional virtual digital model is printed into a real physical object which perfectly matches the computer blueprint. During the printing process, the 3D printers gradually add layers of material in a controlled manner to create the final product without any subtraction. The final products demonstrate structural fidelity consistent with the real specimen. Charles Hull is credited with the patenting of 3D printing during the early 1980s.[1] Initially, the process was developed for use in the engineering and industrial sector. Later, with the advancement of printing materials the technology evolved and made its foray into the field of medicine. Three dimensional virtual models are also in use in medical education for several years. But they are deficient in their tactile experience which is offered by a 3 D printed model. Three-dimensional printing lends itself to multidisciplinary teaching which is the backbone of integrated medical curriculum. In this review we will seek to elucidate the wide range of utility of this teaching tool in the context of current medical education and research.[2], [3], [4]
Basic Principle of Additive Manufacturing ([Figure 1])
Stages in 3D printing.[4], [5], [6]
Producing the computer aided design (CAD). A digital 3D model of the target object is created either directly by 3D surface scanning or indirectly by assembling together the serial slice images obtained by CT scan or MRI scan with the help of a range of free and professional CAD programmes. Other image acquisition modalities include Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and Ultrasonogphy. These images are saved in DICOM format (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) and after post processing by CAD programs the digital 3D model is produced.
Conversion to Stereolithography (STL) file. A critical stage in the additive manufacturing process is the requirement to convert a CAD model into an Stereolithography (STL) file. The Stereolithography (STL) file format uses a series of linked triangles to recreate the surface geometry of a solid model. With the increase in resolution, more triangles are generated, approximating the surfaces of the 3D model more closely along with increasing the size of the STL file.
STL file modification and transfer. The converted STL file may require further processing before being uploaded on AM device.
Repairing any errors within STL file such as gaps, missing triangles or double triangles.
Orientation of 3D model with respect to build platform.
Modification of dimensions if required.
Machine Set up. 3 D printing machines often comprise of many small and intricate parts. So adequate maintenance and proper calibration is essential for producing accurate prints. When the print material is loaded into the printer, the machine should be set at an optimum level. Machine set up also includes cleaning of build chamber, establishing build -parameters, flow rate, energy source etc.
Building the part. Once all the required parameters are established, the building process begins. Most additive manufacturing machines require no further monitoring once the printing process has begun. The machine will follow an automated process and issues generally only arises when the machine runs out of the material or there is error in the software. Inert gases like nitrogen or Argon are typically used in AM system to control build character environment.
Build removal. The removal of a build is a highly technical process involving precise extraction of the build. In some additive manufacturing technologies removal of the build is as simple as separating the printed part from the build platform. Some methods require complicated removal procedures and highly skilled machine operators along with safety equipment and controlled environments.
Post Processing. Post processing refers to stages of finishing the parts for application purpose. This may involve polishing and coating. Some components may require surface coating to strengthen the final part and painting to give an acceptable surface finish.
Application. After post processing parts are ready to use for specific application. Some AM process created components may contain small voids or bubbles trapped inside the components and in few cases bonding may not be proper.[4], [5], [6]

Processes of 3D Printing
The International organization for standardization (ISO)/American society for testing and materials (ASTM) classifies 3D printing processes into seven categories:
Binder jetting (BJ). Liquid binders are selectively deposited on a thin layer of powdered particle, allowing them to bind together.
Material jetting (MJ) Droplets of photosensitive resin are selectively deposited and cured thereafter by ultraviolet light.
Material extrusion (ME) Material is selectively dispensed in a molten or semisolid form through a nozzle or orifice.
Vat photopolymerization (VP). Liquid photopolymer resin kept in a vat is cured by targeted ultraviolet light.
Powder bed fusion (PBF). A laser or electric beam is employed to melt and fuse powdered material together.
Sheet lamination (SL) Thin sheets of material are fed by roller and bonded together and cut into shape.
Directed energy deposition (DED) Focused thermal energy generated by laser beam/ electron beam melts powdered material or material wire.[7], [8]
At present, the utilization of 3D printing in medicine can be categorized into 3 major groups.
Producing models for teaching anatomy and planning and practice of surgical procedures.
Creating prosthetics for implantation.
Bio typing or biological tissue engineering.
Use of 3D Models in Teaching Anatomy
Cadaveric dissection and prosection has been the cornerstone of traditional gross Anatomy teaching for ages. But cadaver acquisition and storage are restricted by several legal, ethical, religious, logistical, financial, and infrastructural issues which varies from region to region.[9]
For example, there are conflicting views regarding the ownership of cadavers or whether it is acceptable to utilize unclaimed bodies without informed consent.[10]
One of the major controversies in current Anatomy education is the relevance of dissection-based teaching in the context of modern medical undergraduate curriculum. There are views that supports cadaveric dissection as an integral part of teaching anatomy and some institutions in UK and Europe has made it redundant Many institutions are now seeking a hybrid modality including Plastination, 2D and 3D imaging and 3D printing to conduct anatomy teaching.[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]
As a teaching-learning tool, 3D printed models offer advantages above traditional cadaveric dissection and plastinated specimens.
In the face of declining cadaveric dissection, 3 D printing can produce an endless variety of learning resources by data acquired from a large range of specimens. The models can be created in a multitude of materials with scope for customization as per the requirement. Moreover, compared to virtual 3D images, these 3D printed models will provide the scope for tactile learning experience. In Australia's Macquarie University 3D printing project was undertaken to make high quality copies of already existing but limited bone bank which included rare anatomical and pathological variants and fragile specimens. It enabled the production of multiple exact replicas of osteology resources that the students can easily handle. Currently used atlases and commercially available plastic models are idealized and don’t incorporate the anatomical variations. But advent of additive manufacturing will reinclude all those variations; In one study, students generated 3 D replicas of left coronary trifurcation and preserved for the future generation.[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]
3D printing is a cost effective and hassle-free alternative to plastination and cadaver dissection, in terms of production and procurement. No ethical or legal issue involved. A rough estimate of setup expenses of a Plastination facility vis a vis 3D printing shows that the later comes much cheaper. Moreover, the production of every single plastinate will involve the recurring dissection cost of the specimen whereas in case of 3D printing these production costs are one off as any number of copies can be produced readily. Models are durable, and devoid of health and safety issues as opposed to traditional wet and fixed cadaver specimens.Topics like embryology can be immensely benefitted by capturing the dynamic development in Utero, both normal and abnormal, with the help of 3D ultrasound and MRI scan to create accurate 3 D digital image. This database will be utilized for creating physical 3 D fetal models depicting the spectrum of normal development along with developmental anomalies like cleft lip, dwarfism etc.[24], [25]
3 D printing can be used to overcome the limitation of visualization of body images on a flat screen or surface. As an example, the complex and obscure structural orientation and relationships of nerves and vessels in the scull base can be fully appreciated by using 3D printing technology to produce anatomically tailored models. Recently a team working at Monash university engineered a hyper realistic facsimile of a human body part using 3 D printing, color software and CT scans for teaching and training purpose.[7]
Can be constructed on a larger or smaller scale as per the requirement. Larger models can be kept in the laboratory on a permanent basis whereas smaller ones can be transported outside the classroom for SDL and into the clinical environment for multidisciplinary integration. Some of the models are fit for layer-by-layer dissection. Some models are customized to depict blood flow circuits using active flow loops as in case of a heart model. Different components of a specimen such as vessels and nerves can be printed out in multicolor using poly materials.[26]
Student response is significantly better in terms of conceptualization and confidence over 2D images and 3D virtual models. In a study performed by Garas et al. Students preferred 3D models over plastinated and cadaver specimens. Studies conducted by different researchers Revealed better post test score when taught with 3 Do specimens. In comparison to cadaveric prosecutions, results using 3D models consistently highlight that they are equally or more beneficial in teaching practical anatomy.[27], [28], [29], [30], [31]
Use of 3D Models in the Surgical Training
3D printed models serve as preoperative training tools for residents in a variety of surgical fields such as anesthesia, orthopedics, otorhinolaryngology, general surgery, ophthalmology, and so on. The simulation sessions are conducted either on general or patient-specific models. Compared to other simulation modalities like virtual reality or 3D digital imaging they provide more satisfactory and accurate depiction.[32], [33], [34]
It provides invaluable surgical practice opportunities and exposure to resident trainees. Realistic models which closely resemble specific types of tissue like skeletal, vascular, cardiac etc., can be manufactured by using different alternative materials.[35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. It allows the creation of a simulated environment which help gain life like visuospatial and tactile orientation. Performing mock procedures on advanced 3D models, prior to operating on a patient, especially in complex and challenging cases, for example, endovascular stent implantation, simulating in vivo environment. translates in better expertise and improved surgical skill. They facilitate learning with scope for making errors but without involving any risk to patients.[40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46]The Accreditation council for medical education in US has mandated simulation-based training for surgical residents for better cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. [47]
Provide an opportunity to plan the optimal surgical approach to cut short the operation time and predict potential complications. Studies revealed that 3D print-assisted surgery resulted in better pre-surgical instrument adaptation, lesser blood loss, and faster healing.[48], [49]
3D printed models can be utilized for better post operative care. An instance of better post operative interdisciplinary handover involves the transfer of congenial cardiac surgery patients from OT to PCICU. The operating team with the help of patient specific 3D printed models can effectively communicate the relevant anatomical abnormality and the surgical interventions to the non-operating health care professionals. An improved understanding by the care giver favors a better post operative care.[50]
Use of 3D Printing for Creating Implants and Prostheses
Additive manufacturing is playing a vital role in the creation of customized and patient-specific medical appliances and pieces of equipment such as prosthetics, orthotics, and implants. Commercially available standard size implants serve the requirement for most of the cases but may not be adequate for all. Customized implants/ prostheses are for those patients falling outside the normal range or for whom there is a disease specific requirement.[4] Individual fitting and exact match with customized pieces leads to improved surgical outcome. Tailored nasal implants have been successfully introduced to close nasal perforations with better retention.[51] Repair of distal tibial fractures is done by using generic locking plates which are designed on average human. Occasional mismatch may occur in patients with larger or smaller tibia or persons with tibial deformities. In these patients a model of the mirror image of intact opposite distal tibia would provide the design of best fit plate.[52], [53], [54], [55] Printing a life size 3Dp model will reduce the chance of generating wasted implant. Such an improvement in terms of both cost and operative time has been reported in orthopedic hip replacement surgery.[56] Customized prostheses are being successfully employed for mandible, hip reconstruction, knee reconstruction, dental restoration.[57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62] Biocompatible material like bio ceramics or biodegradable polymers are being used for construction of bone, repair of bone and construction of cartilage and bones. In children with tracheobronchomegalies, bronchial splints printed from polycaprolactone has been surgically attached to maintain airway patency. Morrison et al., 2015). 3D printing technique can also produce soft tissue replacement like auricular prostheses by using specific compliant materials.[63], [64], [65], [66]
3D Printing of Living Tissue
Tissue engineering for regenerative medicine combining biomaterials and stem cells is being explored. Studies using bio polymer-based scaffold demonstrated that it is interacting with the stem cells that are seeded onto it. Such 3 D p scaffolds are long lasting in nature, rendering them suitable to replace diseased, malfunctioning, and non-functioning organs such as the heart, retina, kidney, skin, vascular network.[67], [68] Organs as a whole or in part may be recreated to perform the exact biological function. There is also the potential of producing organs in a convenient shape to fit the internal topography. It will revolutionize the treatment outcome and reduce the shortage of organ transplants. If organs or tissue grafts can be printed from tissues collected from the patient, it will solve the hazard of host rejection and alleviate the necessity to obtain a tissue match before the procedure or take immunosuppressants thereafter. In the future it will be possible to print out a strip of living tissue from the cultured cells retrieved from the patient's body and then utilize it as a test site for administering medications and vaccines.[69], [70], [71]
Medical Research
3 D printing will enable the production of conceptual and point of care devices both therapeutic and diagnostic, across a multitude of specialty and superspecialist fields including pharmacology, bio engineering, genetics, forensic science etc.[72], [73]
3D printed microfluidic device fitted with biosensors has been put to test to monitor blood glucose and lactate level.
Drug pharmacokinetics have been profiled in Vitro dynamic 3D printed device in pharmaceutical research.[74], [75]
Complex physiological and pathological processes can be better understood by researching on phantoms manufactured by 3 D printing.[76], [77]
Investigation on hemodynamics or aerodynamics can be performed by using velocity encoded MRI or by employing optical flow measurement on transparent models.[78], [79]
Limitations of 3D Printing
The quality of the output depends upon the nature of the input and the equipment used. High-quality prosected specimens illustrating all the salient features without being clumsy are essential for image acquisition, and data processing. Not all dissected specimens are reproducible by scanning and 3 d printing. The quality of the printer and the printing material playa very important part.
Additive manufacturing can only be applied for the structures within a certain dimension range. It cannot produce extremely large structures like a whole body. Models manufactured on a convenient size scale may be misleading regarding the actual dimension of those anatomical components and their relations.
3D models fail to accurately replicate the texture and biomechanics of certain human tissue. Neither they can depict the differential textures when closely related tissue types are opposed.
Poly material printing is to undergo a lot of improvement before it attains perfection.[3], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84]
Conclusion
Numerous researchers have identified and emphasized the immense potential of 3D printing as a teaching learning tool. But effective implementation and integration of this technology requires careful consideration of the economic and practical realities at the ground level. The general consensus is overwhelmingly positive with majority of the subjects reporting a higher level of learning experience and better academic performance. It will be one of the most significant technological tools to advance and augment our understanding and approach to healthcare. Active exploration of 3D printing will surely bring in a paradigm shift in the field of medicine.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- CW Hull. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. United States Patent US 1986. [Google Scholar]
- C Schubert, MCV Langeveld, LA Donoso. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol 2014. [Google Scholar]
- PG Mcmenamin, MR Quayle, CR Mchenry, JW Adams. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 2014. [Google Scholar]
- F Rengier, A Mehndiratta, HV Tengg-Kobligk, CM Zechmann, R Unterhinninghofen, HU Kauczor. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010. [Google Scholar]
- I Gibson, DW Rosen, B Stucker, M Khorasani, D Rosen, B Stucker. . Additive manufacturing technologies 2021. [Google Scholar]
- CK Chua, KF Leong. . 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: principles and applications (with companion media pack)-of rapid prototyping 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- SAM Tofail, EP Koumoulos, A Bandyopadhyay, S Bose, L O’Donoghue, C Charitidis. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today 2018. [Google Scholar]
- N Shahrubudin, TC Lee, R Ramlan. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf 2019. [Google Scholar]
- M Vaccarezza, V Papa. 3D printing: a valuable resource in human anatomy education. Anat Sci Int 2015. [Google Scholar]
- S McHanwell, E Brenner, ARM Chirculescu, J Drukker, HV Mameren, G Mazzotti. The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe-Areview of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 2008. [Google Scholar]
- LM Parker. Anatomical dissection: why are we cutting it out? Dissection in undergraduate teaching. ANZ J Surg 2002. [Google Scholar]
- HW Korf, H Wicht, RL Snipes, JP Timmermans, F Paulsen, G Rune. The dissection course-necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat 2008. [Google Scholar]
- A Winkelmann. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007. [Google Scholar]
- J Chambers, D Emlyn-Jones. Keeping dissection alive for medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2009. [Google Scholar]
- M Heetun. Anatomy dissection: A valuable surgical training tool. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2009. [Google Scholar]
- MH Michalski, JS Ross. The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine. JAMA 2014. [Google Scholar]
- K Sugand, P Abrahams, A Khurana. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 2010. [Google Scholar]
- JC Mclachlan, D Patten. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Y Abouhashem, M Dayal, S Savanah, G Štrkalj. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online. 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- CY Liaw, M Guvendiren. Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication 2017. [Google Scholar]
- CW Moore, TD Wilson, CL Rice. Digital preservation of anatomical variation: 3D-modeling of embalmed and plastinated cadaveric specimens using uCT and MRI. Ann Anat 2017. [Google Scholar]
- JH Fasel, D Aguiar, D Kiss-Bodolay, X Montet, A Kalangos, BV Stimec. Adapting anatomy teaching to surgical trends: a combination of classical dissection, medical imaging, and 3D-printing technologies. Surg Radiol Anat 2016. [Google Scholar]
- MK O’reilly, S Reese, T Herlihy, T Geoghegan, CP Cantwell, RN Feeney. Fabrication and assessment of 3D printed anatomical models of the lower limb for anatomical teaching and femoral vessel access training in medicine. Anat Sci Educ 2016. [Google Scholar]
- H Werner, JRL dos Santos, R Fontes, P Daltro, E Gasparetto, E Marchiori. Additive manufacturing models of fetuses built from three‐dimensional ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- AB Awadh, J Clark, G Clowry, ID Keenan. Multimodal Three‐Dimensional Visualization Enhances Novice Learner Interpretation of Basic Cross‐Sectional Anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2022. [Google Scholar]
- A Mahmoud, M Bennett. Introducing 3-dimensional printing of a human anatomic pathology specimen: potential benefits for undergraduate and postgraduate education and anatomic pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
- M Garas, M Vaccarezza, G Newland, K Mcvay-Doornbusch, J Hasani. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study. Ann Anat 2018. [Google Scholar]
- KH Lim, ZY Loo, SJ Goldie, JW Adams, PG Mcmenamin. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Z Li, Z Li, R Xu, M Li, J Li, Y Liu. Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture--A randomized controlled study in China. Sci Rep 2015. [Google Scholar]
- N Hoyek, C Collet, FD Rienzo, MD Almeida, A Guillot. Effectiveness of three-dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context. Anat Sci Educ 2014. [Google Scholar]
- X Kong, L Nie, H Zhang, Z Wang, Q Ye, L Tang. Do Three-dimensional Visualization and three-dimensional Printing Improve Hepatic Segment Anatomy Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study. J Surg Educ 2016. [Google Scholar]
- W Shui, M Zhou, S Chen, Z Pan, Q Deng, Y Yao. The production of digital and printed resources from multiple modalities using visualization and three-dimensional printing techniques. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2017. [Google Scholar]
- RA Jonas. Training fellows in paediatric cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young 2016. [Google Scholar]
- JP Rahal, B Gao, MG Safain, AM Malek. Stent recanalization of carotid tonsillar loop dissection using the Enterprise vascular reconstruction device. J Clin Neurosci 2014. [Google Scholar]
- JR Ryan, KK Almefty, P Nakaji, DH Frakes. Cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery simulation using patient-specific 3D printing and silicone casting. World Neurosurg 2016. [Google Scholar]
- JP Costello, LJ Olivieri, A Krieger, O Thabit, MB Marshall, SJ Yoo. Utilizing three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of high-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2014. [Google Scholar]
- R Javan, M Bansal, A Tangestanipoor. A prototype hybrid gypsum-based 3-dimensional printed training model for computed tomography-guided spinal pain management. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016. [Google Scholar]
- J Al-Ramahi, H Luo, R Fang, A Chou, J Jiang, T Kille. Development of an innovative 3D printed rigid bronchoscopy training model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016. [Google Scholar]
- JM Otton, R Spina, R Sulas, RN Subbiah, N Jacobs, DW Muller. Left atrial appendage closure guided by personalized 3D-printed cardiac reconstruction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015. [Google Scholar]
- A Armillotta, P Bonhoeffer, G Dubini, S Ferragina, F Migliavacca, G Sala. Use of rapid prototyping models in the planning of percutaneous pulmonary valved stent implantation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2007. [Google Scholar]
- A Sulaiman, L Boussel, F Taconnet, J M Serfaty, H Alsaid, C Attia. In vitro non-rigid life-size model of aortic arch aneurysm for endovascular prosthesis assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008. [Google Scholar]
- F Bruyère, C Leroux, L Brunereau, P Lermusiaux. Rapid prototyping model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training. J Endourol 2008. [Google Scholar]
- M Kalejs, LKV Segesser. Rapid prototyping of compliant human aortic roots for assessment of valved stents. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009. [Google Scholar]
- S Dimmick, M Jones, J Challen, J Iedema, U Wattuhewa, J Coucher. CT-guided procedures: evaluation of a phantom system to teach accurate needle placement. Clin Radiol 2007. [Google Scholar]
- A Ganju, SG Aoun, MR Daou, TY El Ahmadieh, A Chang, L Wang. The role of simulation in neurosurgical education: A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors. World Neurosurg 2013. [Google Scholar]
- SB Issenberg, RJ Scalese. Simulation in health care education. Perspect Biol Med 2008. [Google Scholar]
- S Hamstra, I Philibert. Simulation in graduate medical education: understanding uses and maximizing benefits. J Grad Med Educ 2012. [Google Scholar]
- DBST Matthew, DL Stephen, RIB James, J Matthew. 3D printing of an aortic aneurysm to facilitate decision making and device selection for endovascular aneurysm repair in complex neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther 2013. [Google Scholar]
- E Riesenkampff, U Rietdorf, I Wolf, B Schnackenburg, P Ewert, M Huebler. The practical clinical value of three-dimensional models of complex congenitally malformed hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009. [Google Scholar]
- KHC Li, C Kui, EKM Lee, CS Ho, SH Wong, W Wu. The role of 3D printing in anatomy education and surgical training: A narrative review. MedEdPublish 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Z Onercialtunay, JA Bly, PK Edwards, DR Holmes, GS Hamilton, EK O'Brien. Three-dimensional printing of large nasal septal perforations for optimal prosthetic closure. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016. [Google Scholar]
- W Liang, W Ye, D Ye, Z Zhou, Z Chen, A Li. Construction and biomechanical properties of PolyAxial self-locking anatomical plate based on the geometry of Distal tibia. BioMed Res Int 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- KJ Chung, B Huang, CH Choi, YW Park, HN Kim. Utility of 3D printing for complex distal tibial fractures and malleolar avulsion fractures: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int 2015. [Google Scholar]
- JK Oh, D Sahu, JH Hwang, JW Cho, CW Oh. Technical pitfall while reducing the mismatch between LCP PLT and upper end tibia in proximal tibia fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010. [Google Scholar]
- H K Song, J W Noh, J H Lee, K H Yang. Avoiding rotational mismatch of locking distal tibia plates depends on proper plate position. J Orthop Trauma 2013. [Google Scholar]
- P Tack, J Victor, P Gemmel, L Annemans. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng OnLine 2016. [Google Scholar]
- PS D’urso, WJ Earwaker, TM Barker, MJ Redmond, RG Thompson, DJ Effeney. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast Surg 2000. [Google Scholar]
- S Singare, Y Liu, D Li, B Lu, J Wang, S He. Individually prefabricated prosthesis for maxilla Reconstuction. J Prosthodont 2008. [Google Scholar]
- MY Lee, CC Chang, YC Ku. New layer-based imaging and rapid prototyping techniques for computer-aided design and manufacture of custom dental restoration. J Med Eng Technol 2008. [Google Scholar]
- K Dai, M Yan, Z Zhu, Y Sun. Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthro- plasty 2007. [Google Scholar]
- H Jiankang, L Dichen, L Bingheng, W Zhen, Z Tao. Custom fabrication of composite tibial hemi-knee joint combining CAD/CAE/CAM techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Z Wang, Y Teng, D Li. Fabrication of custom-made artificial semi-knee joint based on rapid prototyping technique: computer- assisted design and manufacturing. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2004. [Google Scholar]
- B Stevens, Y Yang, A Mohandas, B Stucker, KT Nguyen. A review of materials, fabrication methods, and strategies used to enhance bone regeneration in engineered bone tissues. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008. [Google Scholar]
- K Subburaj, C Nair, S Rajesh, SM Meshram, B Ravi. Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007. [Google Scholar]
- L Ciocca, R Mingucci, G Gassino, R Scotti. CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold. J Prosthet Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- SM Peltola, FP Melchels, DW Grijpma, M Kellomäki. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med 2008. [Google Scholar]
- A Gloria, F Causa, T Russo, E Battista, RD Moglie, S Zeppetelli. Three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) bioactive scaffolds with controlled structural and surface properties. Biomacromolecules 2012. [Google Scholar]
- SH Park, DS Park, JW Shin, YG Kang, HK Kim, TR Yoon. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two different materials by the rapid prototyping technique: PCL versus PLGA. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012. [Google Scholar]
- A Faulkner-Jones, S Greenhough, JA King, J Gardner, A Courtney, W Shu. Development of a valve-based cell printer for the formation of human embryonic stem cell spheroid aggregates. Biofabrication 2013. [Google Scholar]
- M Csete. Translational prospects for human induced pluripotent stem cells. Regen Med 2010. [Google Scholar]
- S Mukherjee. The Five Most Promising Uses of 3D Printing in Medicine. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- BC Gross, JL Erkal, SY Lockwood, C Chen, DM Spence. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 2014. [Google Scholar]
- CL Ventola. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T 2014. [Google Scholar]
- SA Gowers, VF Curto, CA Seneci, C Wang, S Anastasova, P Vadgama. 3D printed microfluidic device with integrated biosensors for online analysis of subcutaneous human microdialysate. Anal Chem 2015. [Google Scholar]
- SY Lockwood, JE Meisel, FJ Monsma, DM Spence. A diffusion-based and dynamic 3D-printed device that enables parallel in vitro pharmacokinetic profiling of molecules. Anal Chem 2016. [Google Scholar]
- C Canstein, P Cachot, A Faust, A F Stalder, J Bock, A Frydrychowicz. 3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries. Magn Reson Med 2008. [Google Scholar]
- SK Chung, YR Son, SJ Shin, SK Kim. Nasal airflow during respiratory cycle. Am J Rhinol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- P Ferraiuoli, JC Taylor, E Martin, JW Fenner, AJ Narracott. The accuracy of 3D optical reconstruction and additive manufacturing processes in reproducing detailed subject-specific anatomy. J Imaging 2017. [Google Scholar]
- FL Giesel, A Mehndiratta, H Tengg-Kobligk, A Schaeffer, K Teh, EA Hoffman. Rapid prototyping raw models on the basis of high resolution computed tomography lung data for respiratory flow dynamics. Acad Radiol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- TD Crafts, SE Ellsperman, TJ Wannemuehler, TD Bellicchi, TZ Shipchandler, AV Mantravadi. Three-dimensional printing and its applications in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017. [Google Scholar]
- DG Jones. Three-dimensional printing in anatomy education: assessing potential ethical dimensions. Anat Sci Educ 2019. [Google Scholar]
- J Cornwall. The ethics of 3D printing copies of bodies donated for medical education and research: what is there to worry about?. Australas Med J 2016. [Google Scholar]
- ME Prendergast, JA Burdick. Recent advances in enabling technologies in 3D printing for precision medicine. Adv Materials 2020. [Google Scholar]
- JU Pucci, BR Christophe, JA Sisti, ES Connolly. Three-dimensional printing: technologies, applications, and limitations in neurosurgery. Biotechnol Adv 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Introduction
- Basic Principle of Additive Manufacturing ([Figure 1])
- Processes of 3D Printing
- Use of 3D Models in Teaching Anatomy
- Use of 3D Models in the Surgical Training
- Use of 3D Printing for Creating Implants and Prostheses
- 3D Printing of Living Tissue
- Medical Research
- Limitations of 3D Printing
- Conclusion
- Source of Funding
- Conflict of Interest